经椎间孔镜与单侧双通道镜治疗老年腰椎椎管狭窄症△
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

孟凡志,副主任医师,研究方向:脊柱骨科,(电话)15092991696,(电子信箱)425907285@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687

基金项目:

山东省自然科学基金青年项目(编号:ZR2021QH230);山东省自然科学基金联合基金项目(编号:ZR2022LZY002);山东省中医药科技项目(编号:M-2022097)


Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较经椎间孔内镜(percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy, PTE) 与单侧双通道内镜(unilateral biportal endos-copy, UBE) 治疗老年退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症(degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, DLSS) 的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2020年1 月—2022 年6 月接受手术治疗的单节段DLSS 72 例患者的临床资料。依据医患沟通结果,37 例采用PTE 术,35 例采用UBE 术。比较两组围手术期、随访和影像资料。[结果] PTE 组手术时间[(63.2±11.0) min vs (81.2±10.3) min, P<0.001]、切口总长度[(1.0±0.2) cm vs (2.5±0.3) cm, P<0.001]、术中失血量[(39.2±10.9) ml vs (89.5±11.3) ml, P<0.001]、下地行走时间[(1.4±0.5) d vs(2.2±0.4) d, P<0.001]、住院时间[(9.2±1.4) d vs (11.2±2.1) d, P<0.001] 及完全负重活动时间[(62.2±9.5) d vs (71.1±10.2) d, P<0.001]均显著优于UBE 组。随时间推移,两组腰痛VAS 、腿痛VAS 和ODI 评分均显著降低(P<0.05)。术后1 d 时PTE 组的腰痛VAS 评分[(3.7±1.0) vs (4.3±1.1), P=0.018]、腿痛VAS [(2.9±0.5) vs (3.2±0.4), P=0.007]、ODI 评分[(26.6±7.7) vs (30.3±5.4), P=0.022]均显著优于UBE 组。影像方面,术后两组椎管面积较术前均显著增加(P<0.05),但随时间推移两组椎管面积均再次减少(P<0.05)。末次随访时PTE 组椎管面积显著小于UBE 组[(126.3±25.4) cm2 vs (163.7±28.6) cm2, P<0.001]。相应时间点两组椎间隙高度和腰椎前凸角的差异均无统计意义(P>0.05)。[结论] PTE 和UBE 两种手术方式治疗DLSS 均能取得良好临床疗效,相比UBE,PTE 手术创伤小、恢复快,术后早期腰痛、腿痛轻,但UBE 减压范围更大。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy (PTE) versus unilateral biportal en-doscopy (UBE) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in the elderly. [Methods] A retrospective research was done on 72 patientswho received surgical decompression for single-segment DLSS from January 2020 to June 2022. Based on surgeon-patient discussion pre-operatively, 37 patients underwent PTE, while other 35 patients received UBE. The perioperative, follow-up and imaging data of the twogroups were compared. [Results] The PTE group proved significantly superior to the UBE group in terms of operating time [(63.2±11.0) minvs (81.2±10.3) min, P<0.001], total length of incision [(1.0±0.2) cm vs (2.5±0.3) cm, P<0.001], intraoperative blood loss [(39.2±10.9) ml vs(89.5±11.3) ml, P<0.001], postoperative walk time [(1.4±0.5) days vs (2.2±0.4) days, P<0.001], hospitalization time [(9.2±1.4) days vs (11.2±2.1) days, P<0.001], and time to recover full weight-bearing activity [(62.2±9.5) days vs (71.1±10.2) days, P<0.001]. The VASs for lowerback pain and leg pain, as well as ODI scores were significantly decreased in both groups over time (P<0.05). The PTE group was signifi-cantly better than the UBE group a day postoperatively regarding to VAS score for back pain [(3.7±1.0) vs (4.3±1.1), P=0.018], VAS for legpain [(2.9±0.5) vs (3.2±0.4), P=0.007], and ODI score [(26.6±7.7) vs (30.3±5.4), P=0.022], despite of that the differences in abovesaidscores between the two groups became not statistically significant since then (P>0.05). With respect of imaging, the canal area in bothgroups increased significantly postoperatively compared with those preoperatively (P<0.05), but which in both groups decreased again overtime after surgery (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, PTE group was significantly inferior to the UBE group in canal aera [(126.3±25.4) cm2 vs(163.7±28.6) cm2, P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in intervertebral space height and lumbar lordosis between the two groups at any time points accordingly (P>0.05). [Conclusion] Both PTE and UBE can achieve good clinical efficacy in the treat-ment of DLSS. By comparison, PTE has benefits of less trauma, faster recovery, and less early postoperative low back pain and leg pain, butUBE get a wider range of decompression.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孟凡志,代相鹏,于医波,等. 经椎间孔镜与单侧双通道镜治疗老年腰椎椎管狭窄症△[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, (6): 493-499. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2024.06.03.
MENGFan-zhi, DAI Xiang-peng, YU Yi-bo, et al. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly[J]. ORTHOPEDIC JOURNAL OF CHINA , 2024, (6): 493-499. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2024.06.03.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-17
  • 最后修改日期:2023-11-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-26
  • 出版日期: