新型充气脊柱支架治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

沈思远,硕士研究生在读,研究方向:外科学(骨科),(电话)18351996087,(电子信箱)ssy18351996087@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.2

基金项目:

南京市卫生科技发展专项基金项目(编号:YKK20215)


A novel inflatable spine support for treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究新型充气脊柱支架治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折 (thoracolumbar compression fractures, TLCF) 的疗效。[方法] 2018 年 1 月—2019 年 12 月在本院非手术治疗的 50 例 TLCF 患者纳入本研究。依据医患沟通结果,26 例采用新型脊柱充气支架治疗(支架组);另外 24 例采用传统垫枕治疗(垫枕组)。比较两组临床与影像资料。[结果]支架组下床时间显著早于垫枕组 [(60.8±4.1)d vs (63.9±3.3)d, P=0.012]。随时间推移,两组患者的 VAS 评分和 ODI 评分均显著下降(P<0.05)。治疗 1 周后支架组 VAS 评分 [(3.5±0.7) vs (4.1±0.8), P=0.008] 和 ODI 评分 [(29.5±2.6) vs (32.1±2.2), P<0.001] 均明显低于垫枕组。影像方面, 随时间推移,两组腰椎前凸角和椎体前缘高度比显著增加(P<0.05),而局部后凸角显著下降(P<0.05)。治疗 3 个月后支架组腰椎前凸角 [(47.3±1.0)° vs (45.3±0.9)°, P<0.001]、局部后凸 Cobb 角 [(10.5±0.7)° vs (12.0±0.4)°, P<0.001] 及椎体前缘高度比 [(93.1± 1.9)% vs (88.1±2.4)%, P<0.001] 均显著优于垫枕组。[结论] 与传统垫枕治疗相比,新型充气脊柱支架可更有效维持骨折复位, 改善治疗的舒适度,改进治疗效果。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a novel inflatable spine support (ISS) for treatment of thoracolumbar com- pression fractures (TLCF). [Methods] A total of 50 patients who received non-operative treatment for TLCF in our hospital were enrolled in- to this study from January 2018 to December 2019. Based on doctor-patient communication, 26 patients received ISS therapy, while the re- maining 24 patients underwent the conventional pad therapy. Clinical and imaging data were compared between the two groups. [Results] The ISS group resumed ambulation significantly earlier than the conventional group [(60.8±4.1)days vs (63.9±3.3)days, P=0.012]. The VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly over time in both groups (P<0.05). The ISS group was marked significantly lower VAS score [(3.5± 0.7) vs (4.1±0.8), P=0.008] and ODI scores [(29.5±2.6) vs (32.1±2.2), P<0.001] than the conventional group. Radiographically, lumbar lordo- sis and anterior vertebral height ratio increased significantly (P<0.05), while the local kyphotic angle decreased significantly over time in both groups (P<0.05). The ISS group proved significantly superior to the conventional group in terms of lumbar lordosis [(47.3±1.0)° vs (45.3±0.9)°, P<0.001], local kyphotic angle [(10.5±0.7)° vs (12.0±0.4)°, P<0.001] and anterior vertebral height ratio [(93.1±1.9)% vs (88.1± 2.4)%, P<0.001] 3 weeks after treatment. [Conclusion] The new inflatable spine support does maintain fracture reduction more effectively, improve the comfort of treatment and improve the therapeutic outcomes over the conventional pad therapy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

沈思远,梁锋,田纪伟,等. 新型充气脊柱支架治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (10): 949-952. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.10.19.
SHEN Si-yuan, LIANG Feng, TIAN Ji-wei, et al. A novel inflatable spine support for treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures[J]. ORTHOPEDIC JOURNAL OF CHINA , 2023, 31 (10): 949-952. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.10.19.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-10
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-24
  • 出版日期: