锁骨中段骨折两种内固定的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

田浩然,副主任医师,研究方向:创伤骨科及手足外科,(电话)13955828936,(电子信箱)yi10652810306@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.41

基金项目:

国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展研究中心项目(编号:W2015QJ058)


Comparison of two internal fixations for midshaft clavicle fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的]比较桥接内固定系统结合 Nice 结与钢板固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月—2021 年 6 月本科收治的 62 例锁骨中段骨折患者的临床资料。根据医患沟通结果,28 例采用桥接内固定系统结合 Nice 结治疗(桥接组),34 例采用钢板内固定治疗(钢板组),比较两组围手术期、随访及影像结果。[结果]两组患者手术均顺利完成,均无血管、神经损伤等严重并发症。桥接组手术时间、术中出血量、恢复主动活动时间均显著优于钢板组 (P<0.05),两组切口长度、切口愈合等级、住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随时间推移,两组术后早期 VAS 评分显著减少(P> 0.05),相应时间点,两组间 VAS 评分的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。两组患者均获随访 12 个月以上,桥接组恢复完全负重活动时间显著早于钢板组(P<0.05)。随术后时间推移,两组患者肩关节 Constant-Murley 评分均显著增加(P>0.05),相应时间点两组间 Constant-Murley 评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,桥接组骨折复位质量优于钢板组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组骨折愈合时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]桥接内固定系统结合 Nice 结固定锁骨中段骨折临床效果优于传统钢板内固定。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of the bridge-link fixation combined with Nice knot (BLFNK) versus plate for midshaft clavicular fractures. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 62 patients who received open reduction and internal fixa- tion (ORIF) for midshaft clavicle fractures in our departments from January 2019 to June 2021. According to the results of doctor-patient communication, 28 patients were treated with BLFNK, while the remaining 34 patients had fractures fixed with plate. The documents re- garding to perioperative period, follow-up and imaging were compared between the two groups. [Results] All the patients in both groups had ORIF performed smoothly with no serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury. The BLFNK group proved significantly su- perior to the plate group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss and time to return active activity (P<0.05), although there were no significant differences in incision length, incision healing grade and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores for pain during the early postoperative period were significantly reduced over time in both groups (P<0.05), which was not significantly differ- ent between the two groups at corresponding time points (P>0.05). All of them in both groups were followed up for more than 12 months, and the BLFNK group resumed full weight-bearing activity significantly earlier than the plate group (P<0.05). The Constant-Murley scores significantly increased in both groups over time after surgery (P<0.05), which was not significantly different between the two groups at corre- sponding time points (P>0.05). Radiographically, the BLFNK group got better fracture reduction quality than the plate group regardless of the fact that there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] The bridge-link fixation system combined with Nice knot achieves better clini- cal outcomes than the traditional plate internal fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田浩然,柴雷子,宋财,等. 锁骨中段骨折两种内固定的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (8): 678-682. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.08.02.
TIAN Hao-ran, CHAI Lei-zi, SONG Cai, et al. Comparison of two internal fixations for midshaft clavicle fractures[J]. ORTHOPEDIC JOURNAL OF CHINA , 2023, 31 (8): 678-682. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.08.02.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-10
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-26
  • 出版日期: