内侧半月板Ramp区IV型损伤两种缝合方法比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

山东中医药大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of two suture method for type IV Ramp injury of the meniscus
Author:
Affiliation:

Affiliated Hospital to Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 对比探讨关节镜下缝合钩和Fast-fix缝合半月板Ramp区IV型损伤的中期临床疗效。[方法] 回顾分析2016年1月~2020年10月45例前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤合并半月板Ramp区IV型损伤患者的临床资料,21例应用缝合钩缝合Ramp区损伤,24例应用Fast-fix缝合。对比患者围手术期、随访及影像学结果。[结果] 所有患者均顺利完成手术,术中未出现血管、神经损伤等并发症。缝合钩组切口总长度、手术时间均长于Fast-fix组(P<0.001)[(5.9±0.5)cm vs (5.1±0.6)cm, P<0.001;(91.2±10.6)min vs (62.5±8.4)min, P<0.001],缝合钩组住院费用少于Fast-fix组[(3.4±0.3)cm vs (4.3±0.7)万元, P<0.001]。两组Ramp撕裂长度、缝合针数、住院时间及正常行走时间的等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者均获36~72个月随访。两组术后随访的轴移试验、Lachman 试验、膝关节屈伸度、膝关节间隙压痛、麦氏征、IKDC评分及Lysholm评分均优于术前(P<0.001)。但同一时间两组轴移试验、Lachman 试验、IKDC评分及Lysholm评分以上各指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根据半月板Barrett愈合标准,术后1年缝合钩组、Fast-fix组分别有19例、23例Ramp损伤完全愈合,愈合率分别为90.48%,95.83%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(P=0.428)。术后1年MRI显示缝合钩组、Fast-fix组分别有19例、21例Ramp损伤完全愈合,愈合率分别为90.48%、87.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 关节镜下缝合钩和Fast-fix缝合半月板Ramp区IV型损伤均可获得满意的中期疗效。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic suture hook and Fast-fix repair for type IV Ramp injury. [Methods] Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 45 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries combined with type IV Ramp area injury of the meniscus from January 2016 to October 2020. Among them, 21 cases were treated with suture hook and 24 cases were treated with Fast-fix. Comparative analysis of perioperative period, follow-up, and imaging results. [Results] All patients underwent successful surgeries without complications such as vascular or nerve injuries. The surgical duration and total incision length in suture hook Group was longer than that in Fast-fix Group [(5.9±0.5)cm vs (5.1±0.6)cm, P<0.001;(91.2±10.6)min vs (62.5±8.4)min, P<0.001]. The hospitalization costs in suture hook Group was less than that in Fast-fix Group[(3.4±0.3)cm vs (4.3±0.7) ten thousand yuan, P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in Ramp tear length, number of sutures and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for 36 to 72 months. The postoperative pivot shift test, Lachman test, range of motion of knee, tenderness, McMurray sign, IKDC score, and Lysholm score were all improved compared to preoperative values in both groups (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the above indexes between the two groups at the same time (P>0.05). According to the Barrett healing criteria for meniscal repair, at 1 year postoperatively, complete healing rates of of suture hook Group and Fast-fix Group Ramp injuries was 90.48% and 95.83%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). MRI at 1 year postoperatively showed complete healing of Ramp injuries of suture hook Group and Fast-fix Group was 90.48% and 87.5%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). [Conclusion] Arthroscopic suturing hook and Fast-fix suturing for type IV Ramp injury of the meniscus can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-25
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-22
  • 录用日期:2024-03-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: