腰椎退行性病单侧双通道内镜与开放椎间融合比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;2.Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopy with open interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative disease
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;2.Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较半椎板切除腰椎椎间融合术(Hemilamiectomy and lumbar interbody fusion,HL-LIF)与单侧双通道脊柱内镜下椎间融合术(Biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion,BE-LIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。 [方法] 本回顾性分析2022年3月—2022年11月在山东中医药大学附属医院治疗的腰椎退行性疾病78例患者的临床资料。按照医患沟通结果,35例采用BE-LIF,41例采用HL-LIF,比较两组围手术期、随访及辅助检查等资料。 [结果] 与开放组相比,内镜组手术时间[(204.5±57.8)min VS (162.0±50.0)min, P<0.001]较长,但切口小[(7.1±1.0)cm VS (11.5±2.2)cm, P<0.001]、术中失血量小[(240.0±121.2)mL VS (344.9±140.9)mL, P=0.001]、下地时间早[(3.2±0.5)d VS (4.4±0.5)d, P<0.001]。两组输血率、切口愈合等级、住院天数的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平均随访时长15.8±2.3个月。随时间推移,两组的VAS评分、ODI评分均显著下降(P<0.05)。与开放组相比,内镜组术后5个月以内的腰痛VAS评分、ODI评分均显著降低(P<0.05),JOA评分显著升高(P<0.05)。两组术后椎间隙高度、腰椎前凸角度均较术前显著增加(P<0.05)。各时间点两组椎间隙高度、腰椎前凸角、椎间融合Bridwell等级的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 [结论] 两种术式均取得良好的临床疗效。BE-LIF较HL-LIF手术创伤小,术后早期腰痛疼痛轻,功能恢复速度快。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]: To compare the clinical efficacy of hemilamiectomy and lumbar interbody fusion (HL-LIF) with that of biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (BE-LIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. [Methods]: The clinical data of 78 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2022 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of doctor-patient communication, BE-LIF was used in 35 cases and HL_LIF in 41 cases, and the perioperative period, follow-up, and imaging data of the two groups were compared. [RESULTS]: Compared with the open group, the endoscopic group had a longer operative time [(204.5±57.8)min vs (162.0±50.0)min, P<0.001], but a smaller incision [(7.1±1.0)cm vs (11.5±2.2)cm, P<0.001], smaller intraoperative blood loss [(240.0±121.2)mL vs (344.9± 140.9) mL, P=0.001], and early time to get off the floor [(3.2±0.5) d vs (4.4±0.5) d, P<0.001]. The differences in blood transfusion rate, incision healing grade, and hospitalization days between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The mean length of follow-up was 15.8 ± 2.3 months. Over time, the VAS scores and ODI scores of both groups decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with the open group, the VAS scores and ODI scores for low back pain were significantly lower (P < 0.05) and the JOA scores were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the endoscopic group up to 5 months after surgery. Postoperative intervertebral space height and lumbar lordosis angle were significantly increased in both groups compared with the preoperative period (P < 0.05). The differences in intervertebral space height, lumbar anterior convexity angle, and Bridwell grade of interbody fusion between the two groups at each time point were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). [Conclusion]: Good clinical efficacy was achieved in both surgical procedures.BE-LIF is less traumatic than HL-LIF, with less pain in early postoperative lumbar pain and faster functional recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-14
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-09
  • 录用日期:2024-03-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: