双束袢钢板与锁骨钩治疗急性肩锁脱位比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学附属明基医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京市卫生科技发展专项基金项目


Comparative study of double-bundle Endobutton plate with loop and clavicle hook plate in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation
Author:
Affiliation:

The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

The Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较双束Endobutton带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效。 [方法] 回顾性分析2019年1月—2021年6月本院收治的44例急性肩锁关节脱位患者,其中21例采用双束Endobutton带袢钢板固定(袢板组),23例采用钩钢板固定(钩板组),并分析比较两组围手术期、随访及影像学资料。 [结果] 两组在手术时间、术中失血量及主动活动时间方面无明显差异(P>0.05);在切口长度、住院时间方面,袢板组均优于钩板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组在疼痛缓解及肩关节功能恢复方面,均取得满意的疗效,但随着随访时间的推移,VAS评分、Constant-Murley评分、前屈上举ROM及外展上举ROM在术后3月、末次随访时,袢板组均较钩板组更有优势(P<0.05)。影像学方面,两组患者在术后3月、末次随访时,喙锁、肩锁间距均较术前有显著减小(P<0.05),但在相同时间点上,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 [结论] 双束Endobutton带袢钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位,较锁骨钩钢板固定,具有手术切口更小、肩关节功能更好、并发症发生率更少等优势,且无需二次取出。双束Endobutton带袢钢板固定是治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的良好选择。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the efficacy of double-bundle Endobutton plate with loop and clavicle hook plate in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. [Methods] From January 2019 to June 2021, 44 patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 21 patients were fixed with double-bundle Endobutton with loop plate (loop plate group), and 23 patients were treated with hook plate (hook plate group), and the perioperative period, follow-up and imaging data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. [Results] There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and active activity time between the two groups (P > 0.05); In terms of incision length and hospital stay, the loop plate group was better than the hook plate group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The two groups achieved satisfactory results in pain relief and shoulder function recovery, but with the passage of follow-up time, VAS score, constant Murley score, ROM of forward flexion and upward lift, and ROM of abduction and upward lift were better in the loop plate group than in the hook plate group at 3 months after operation and the last follow-up (P < 0.05). In terms of imaging, the distance between coracoclavicle and acromioclavicular was significantly reduced in the two groups at 3 months after operation and the last follow-up (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the same time point (P > 0.05). [Conclusion] Double-bundle Endobutton with loop plate for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, compared with hook plate fixation, has the advantages of smaller surgical incision, better shoulder joint function, and less complication rate, and does not require secondary removal. Double-bundle Endobutton with loop plate fixation is a good choice for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-20
  • 最后修改日期:2023-11-21
  • 录用日期:2024-03-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: