基于PearlDiver数据库水泥与非水泥全膝置换比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.新乡医学院第一附属医院;2.美国弗吉尼亚大学医学院骨科实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目


Comparison of Cemented and Non-Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the PearlDiver Database
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University;2.University of Virginia School of Medicine, USA

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 通过大型回顾性研究,与水泥人工全膝关节置换术(Total Knee Arthroplasty TKA)进行比较,探讨非水泥TKA的手术效果。 [方法] 通过检索美国大型医疗记录数据库PearlDiver,回顾性分析2015年10月-2020年10月采用TKA治疗的103231例膝关节骨关节炎患者。比较两组患者术后90天内的内科并发症及术后2年内的外科并发症。 [结果] 非水泥组TKA术后90天内输血率显著高于水泥组(2.33% vs 1.90%;OR 1.24,p<0.001),深静脉血栓发生率低于水泥组(2.86% vs 3.17%;OR 0.89,p=0.032),肺炎、肺栓塞等其他内科并发症无统计学差异。非水泥TKA术后2年内假体无菌松动发生率低于水泥组(1.84% vs 2.11%;OR 0.87,p=0.031)。伤口并发症、假体周围感染、关节僵硬、假体周围骨折、关节翻修等发生率无明显组间差异。 [结论] 在初次TKA中,与水泥TKA相比,非水泥TKA的围手术期失血风险显著升高,而其术后假体的无菌松动几率则相对降低。非水泥与水泥TKA在假体周围感染、关节翻修及其他并发症风险方面无明显的差异。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]: To compare the postoperative outcomes of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented TKA through a large-scale retrospective analysis. [Methods]: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a major U.S. medical records database PearlDiver, covering 103,231 cases of knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent TKA between October 2015 and October 2020. The rates of medical complications within 90 days and surgical complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared between the two groups. Results: The transfusion rate within 90 days post-surgery was significantly higher in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (2.33% vs. 1.90%; OR 1.24, p<0.001). However, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was lower in the cementless group (2.86% vs. 3.17%; OR 0.89, p=0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in other medical complications, such as pneumonia and pulmonary embolism. Within 2 years post-surgery, the rate of aseptic loosening of the prosthesis was lower in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (1.84% vs. 2.11%; OR 0.87, p=0.031). Rates of wound complications, periprosthetic infection, joint stiffness, periprosthetic fractures, and revision surgeries showed no significant intergroup differences. [Conclusion]: In primary TKA, patients receiving cementless TKA are at a significantly higher risk of perioperative blood loss compared to cemented TKA, but they are likely to experience a relatively lower risk of aseptic prosthesis loosening postoperatively. Between cementless and cemented TKA, no significant differences exist on risks of periprosthetic infection, revision surgery, or other complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-10
  • 最后修改日期:2023-10-28
  • 录用日期:2024-02-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: