Henry入路复位固定桡远端骨折是否缝合旋前方肌
作者:
作者简介:

徐士刚,主治医师,研究方向:关节、创伤外科,(电话)13813876797,(电子信箱)452305624@qq.com

中图分类号:

R683.2


Reduction and fixation of distal radial fracture by Henry approach with or without pronator quadratus reattachment
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的] 探讨 Henry 入路复位固定桡远端骨折是否缝合旋前方肌对术前早期临床结果的影响。[方法] 回顾性分析 2018 年 1 月—2019 年 8 月本科采用 Henry 入路复位固定 AO-C 型桡远端骨折的 52 例患者的临床资料。依据术前医患沟通结果,20 例完成复位内固定后术中缝合旋前方肌,32 例术中未缝合旋前方肌。比较两组患者围手术期和短期随访资料。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,两组手术时间、切口长度、切口愈合等级和住院时间的差异均无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。两组患者均获随访 3 个月以上,随着时间推移,两组 VAS 疼痛评分、腕关节掌屈-背伸 ROM、腕关节桡偏-尺偏 ROM 及前臂旋前-旋后 ROM 均显著改善 (P<0.05)。术后 1 周和 1 个月时缝合组 VAS 评分显著低于未缝合组 [(3.3±0.5) vs (5.3±1.3) , P<0.001; (2.5±0.8) vs (3.2±1.0) , P=0.008];术后 1 个月时缝合组患者前臂旋前-旋后 ROM 显著大于未缝合组 [(90.3±15.9)° vs (79.6±9.5)°, P=0.011]。 术后 3 个月时按 Gartland-Werley 标准,缝合组腕关节功能优良率为 18/2 (90.0%),未缝合组为 24/4 (78.0%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]Henry 入路开放复位内固定桡远端骨折缝合旋前方肌可有效缓解术后短期疼痛,并可改善术后前臂旋转活动度。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the effect of pronator quadratus reattachment on the early clinical outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radial fracture by Henry approach. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 52 patients who re- ceived ORIF for AO type C distal radial fractures by Henry approach in our department from January 2018 to August 2019. According to the preoperative doctor-patient communication, 20 patients had the pronator quadratus reattached with suture (RA) following ORIF, while the other 32 patients remained the muscle in non-reattachment (NR) by suture. The perioperative and short-term follow-up data of the two groups were compared. [Results] All patients in both groups had the corresponding operations performed successfully, with no significant differences in terms of operation time, incision length, incision healing grade and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05) . With time of the followed- up period lasted for more than 3 months after surgery, the VAS score for pain wrist flexion- extension range of motion (ROM) , radio- ulnar deviation ROM and forearm pronation- supination ROM significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05) . The RA group proved significantly superior to the NR group in terms of VAS score at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively [(3.3±0.5) vs (5.3±1.3) , P< 0.001; (2.5±0.8) vs (3.2±1.0) , P=0.008] , as well as the forearm pronation-supination ROM 1 month after surgery [(90.3±15.9)° vs (79.6± 9.5)° , P=0.011] . According to Gartland-Werley criteria 3 months after surgery, the excellent and good rate of joint function was 18/2 (90.0%) in the RA group, while 24/4 (78.0%) in NR group, which was not statistically significant (P>0.05) . [Conclusion] The pronator qua- dratus reattachment in open reduction internal fixation by Henry approach for distal radial fractures does effectively relieve postoperative pain and improve postoperative forearm rotational motion.

    参考文献
    [1] 邱福平,赵晓龙,王芳,等.掌背侧入路双钢板内固定治疗AOC型桡骨远端骨折 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(24):2298-2300.
    [2] Huang XX,Jia QY,Li HQ,et al.Evaluation of sparing the pronatorquadratus for volar plating of distal radius fractures:a retrospectiveclinical study [J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):625-625.
    [3] 吴斌,康正阳,魏世坤,等.改良Henry入路缝合旋前方肌对桡骨远端骨折功能恢复疗效比较 [J].中国骨伤,2022,35(1):49-53.
    [4] 常西海,王宝鹏,魏勇,等.两种复位固定方式治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(8):712-716.
    [5] 施凯兵,张红,施海峰,等.经旋前方肌插入锁定接骨板治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的疗效分析 [J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2018,11(12):914-917.
    [6] 张琳袁,王跃挺,刘凤祥,等.经单一掌侧入路掌侧与桡侧双钢板内固定治疗桡侧柱不稳的 AO-C3 型桡骨远端骨折 [J].中华手外科杂志,2022,38(3):165-168.
    [7] 李祯华,余得水,张玉明,等.保留旋前方肌掌侧入路手术治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效分析 [J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(9):696-699.
    [8] 朱宗东,廖锋,魏丹,等.充填植骨并部分保留旋前方肌掌侧锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端 C3.1、C3.2 型骨折 [J].中华手外科杂志,2022,38(3):214-217.
    [9] 廖明新,曾卡斌,陈小杰.经肱桡肌腱-旋前方肌入路钢板固定治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折 [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(2):132-136.
    [10] 叶友友,林焱斌,庄研,等.两种经皮微创保留旋前方肌钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较 [J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(11):960-966.
    [11] 白晓冬,许国强,王刚,等.桡骨远端骨折掌侧钢板螺钉内固定术中保留旋前方肌对疗效的影响 [J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(1):24-27.
    [12] Zhang DF,Meyer MA,Earp BE,et al.Role of pronator quadratusrepair in volar locking plate treatment of distal radius fractures [J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2022,30(15):696-702.
    [13] Goorens CK,Debaenst N,Van RK,et al.Minimally invasive prona?tor quadratus sparing approach versus extended flexor carpi radia?lis approach with pronator quadratus repair for volar plating in dis?tal radial fractures [J].J Wrist Surg,2022,11(1):41-47.
    [14] Maniglio M,Truong V,Zumstein M,et al.Should we repair the pro?nator quadratus in a distal radius fracture with an ulnar styloidbase fracture?A biomechanical study [J].J Wrist Surg,2021,10(5):407-412.
    [15] 应晓洲,陈昭心,陈辉,等.保留旋前方肌改良Henry入路掌侧钢板内固定治疗老年桡骨远端骨折 [J].中华创伤杂志,2020,36(6):514-519.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

徐士刚,邱福平,张磊,等. Henry入路复位固定桡远端骨折是否缝合旋前方肌[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31 (6): 563-566. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.06.18.
XU Shi-gang, QIU Fu-ping, ZHANG Lei, et al. Reduction and fixation of distal radial fracture by Henry approach with or without pronator quadratus reattachment[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China , 2023, 31 (6): 563-566. DOI:10.3977/j. issn.1005-8478.2023.06.18.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:186
  • 下载次数: 270
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-18
  • 最后修改日期:2023-02-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-27