张筋撑骨”复位椎弓根钉固定单节段胸腰椎骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国中医科学院望京医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

北京市中医药科技发展资金项目(编号:JJ-2020-75); 中国中医科学院科技创新工程(编号:C12021A02007)


Reduction of “stretching sinew and distracting bone” combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating single-segment thoracolumbar fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

Wangjing Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medicine Scicences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]比较“张筋撑骨”复位法和单纯经皮椎弓根螺钉撑开复位法在治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折中的临床疗效和影像学差异。[方法] 回顾性病例分析2019年1月—2021年6月行经皮椎弓根螺钉手术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折47例,所有患者均A型无神经症状,依据术前医患沟通结果,23例“常规组”采用单纯经皮椎弓根螺钉撑开复位法,24例“复位组”采用“张筋撑骨”复位法。比较两组围手术期、随访和影像资料。[结果] 两组术中失血量、下地时间、住院时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但复位组手术时间[(58.8±7.4) min vs (74.0±4.6),P<0.05]、透视次数[(26.1±3.2) min vs (32.3±2.8),P<0.05]均多于常规组。早期并发症常规组出现2例螺钉拔出,采用骨水泥强化。随访时间12~24个月,平均(15.2±2.5)个月。两组患者与术前相比,两组患者术后随访时间段VAS评分、ODI评分均有显著降低(P<0.05);相应时间点,两组间在术后各随访时间段VAS评分及术后3月随访ODI评分无统计学意义(P>0.05),但复位组在末次随访ODI评分优于常规组(P<0.05)。影像方面,与术前相比较,两组患者术后随访时间段伤椎局部后凸角、伤椎椎体楔形角、伤椎椎体前缘高度百分比均显著改善(P<0.05);相应时间点组间比较,复位组术后即刻、术后3月及末次随访伤椎局部后凸角、伤椎椎体楔形角、伤椎椎体前缘高度百分比均优于常规组(P<0.05)。 [结论] 采用“张筋撑骨”复位法治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折,可以较好恢复伤椎高度、矫正椎体楔形变、避免后凸畸形发生,维持长远期的临床疗效。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical effect and radiological outcomes between the reduction of “stretching sinew and distracting bone” and only stretching the external reduction device by using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of the single-segment thoracolumbar fractures.[Methods] A retrospective analysis of 47 cases of the single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptom from January 2019 to June 2021 was performed.According to the consequences of preoperative doctor-patient communication, 23 cases received only stretching the external reduction device by using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation,24 cases utilized the reduction of “stretching sinew and distracting bone”.The perioperative,follow-up and radiographic documents were compared between the two groups.[Results] There were no significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss,walking time,and hospital between the group(),nevertheless the reduction group proved siginificantly inferior to the common group in terms of operation time[(58.8±7.4) min vs (74.0±4.6),P<0.05],intraoperative fluoroscopy [(26.1±3.2) times vs (32.3±2.8) times, P<0.05].The early complication occurred in 2 cases of screw misplacement in the common group,which was used bone cement reinforcement.The followed-up period lasted for 12 to 24 months, with an average of (15.2±2.5) months. Compared with those before surgery,the visual analogue scale scores,and Oswestry disability index of two groups after treatment were significantly improved in the follow-up period(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the visual analogue scale scores of the follow-up period and the Oswestry disability index of 3 months after sugery between two groups(P>0.05).The Oswestry disability index was better in the the reduction group than those of the common group at the latest follow-up(P<0.05).In terms of imaging evaluation,the local kyphotic angle (LKA),the vertebral wedge angle of fracture vertebral(VWA), and the anterior height ration of fracture vertebral (AVH%) significantly improved in both groups at the follow-up period compared with thoses preoperative(P<0.05). The LKA,VWA ,and AVH% were better in the the reduction group than those of the common group at postoperative,3 months after surgery and latest follow-up(P<0.05).[Conclusion] The reduction of “stretching sinew and distracting bone” combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating single-segment thoracolumbar fracture can better restore the injured vertebral body height,correct the wedge-shaped of vertebral body,avoid local kyphosis deformity,and yiled long-term clinical outcome.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-09
  • 最后修改日期:2023-09-22
  • 录用日期:2023-11-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: