后路腰椎融合术椎间笼架沉降的相关因素
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东中医药大学;2.山东中医药大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

山东省老年医学学会2021年科技攻关立项公示(LKJGG2021Z009)


Factors associated with intervertebral cage subsidence in posterior lumbar fusion
Author:
Affiliation:

1.山东中医药大学;2.山东中医药大学附属医院

Fund Project:

Shandong Gerontology Society 2021 Science and Technology Research Project Announcement (LKJGG2021Z009)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 探讨腰椎后路融合术后影响融合器沉降的高危因素,并分析其与融合器沉降的相关性。 方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年1月山东省中医院骨科病房收治且获得随访的60例行L4/5腰椎后路融合手术患者资料。根据末次随访时融合器是否沉降,将所有患者分为沉降组(30例)和未沉降组(30例)。分析比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后下地时间、椎间融合时间、术前手术间隙终板炎情况及治疗后的VAS评分与Oswestry指数的改善情况。通过CT和MRI测量并比较术前椎旁肌CSA、FI 、椎旁肌FCS、腰大肌CSA、椎体CSA,测量比较术中即刻矫正椎间隙高度、即刻SL矫正角度及术后SS、LL、PT、PI-LL。计算椎旁肌rCSA、腰大肌rCSA、椎旁肌rFCSA;应用logistic回归分析确定影响腰椎后路融合术后融合器沉降发生的高危因素。 结果 沉降组骨密度T值低于未沉降组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.018);随访患者有4例出现终板损伤皆在沉降组(P=0.038);沉降组腰大肌rCSA、椎旁肌CSA、椎旁肌rCSA及椎旁肌rFCSA均显著小于沉降组,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.043,P=0.047,P<0.001,P<0.001);沉降组椎体面积、即刻矫正椎间隙高度、即刻SL矫正角度、椎间骨融合时间显著大于未沉降组(P=0.004、P=0.020,P=0.009、P=0.023)。二元多元逻辑回归分析得出椎间骨融合时间(OR=1.158,P=0.045)、即刻椎间隙矫正高度(OR=1.438,P=0.038)、即刻SL矫正角度(OR=1.101,P=0.019)是融合器沉降的危险因素。骨密度(OR=0.544,P=0.016)、椎旁肌rFCSA(OR=0.525,P=0.048)是融合器沉降保护因素。结论 椎间骨融合时间过长、即可矫正椎间隙高度及即刻SL矫正角度过大是腰椎后路融合术后融合器沉降的独立高危因素。而骨密度及椎旁肌rFCSA越大时,则术后越不容易发生融合器沉降。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective To investigate the high risk factors affecting the fusion fusion after posterior lumbar fusion and analyze the correlation between them and the fusion fusion. Methods The data of 60 patients with L4/5 posterior lumbar fusion surgery admitted to the orthopedic ward of Shandong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into a sedimentation group (30 cases) and a non-sedimentation group (30 cases) according to whether the fusion device was settled or not at the last follow-up. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative time to the ground, interbody fusion time, preoperative intraoperative space endlaminitis, and the improvement of VAS score and Oswestry index after treatment were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Preoperative paravertebral muscle CSA, FI, paravertebral muscle FCS, psoas major muscle CSA, and vertebral body CSA were measured and compared by CT and MRI. Intraoperative space height and Angle of immediate SL correction were measured and compared, as well as postoperative SS, LL, PT, and PI-LL. Paravertebral rCSA, psoas major rCSA and paravertebral rFCSA were calculated. logistic regression analysis was used to determine the high risk factors affecting the fusion instrument subsidence after posterior lumbar fusion. Results Bone mineral density (BMD) in the sedimentation group was lower than that in the non-sedimentation group, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.018). There were 4 patients with endplate injury in the sedimentation group (P=0.038). rCSA of psoas major muscle, CSA of paravertebral muscle, rCSA of paravertebral muscle and rFCSA of paravertebral muscle in sedimentation group were significantly lower than those in sedimentation group, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.043, P=0.047, P<0.001, P<0.001). The vertebral body area, the height of immediately corrected intervertebral space, the Angle of immediate SL correction and the time of intervertebral fusion in the sedimentation group were significantly higher than those in the non-sedimentation group (P=0.004, P=0.020, P=0.009, P=0.023). Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the time of intervertebral fusion (OR=1.158, P=0.045), the height of immediate intervertebral space correction (OR=1.438, P=0.038), and the Angle of immediate SL correction (OR=1.101, P=0.019) were the risk factors for fusion fusion. Bone mineral density (OR=0.544, P=0.016) and paravertebral muscle rFCSA (OR=0.525, P=0.048) were protective factors. Conclusion Long intervertebral fusion time, correctable intervertebral space height and immediate SL correction Angle are independent high risk factors for fusion sink after posterior lumbar fusion. The greater the BMD and the paravertebral muscle rFCSA, the less likely the fusion subsidence was to occur.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-07
  • 最后修改日期:2023-11-17
  • 录用日期:2023-12-29
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: