全髋关节置换三种引流方式比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

安徽医科大学附属六安医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Comparison of three drainage methods after total hip arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Lu '2.'3.an Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 [目的] 比较全髋关节置换(Total Hip Arthroplasty,THA)三种引流方式对术后失血量的影响。 [方法] 2018年1月-2022年3月在安徽医科大学附属六安医院行THA治疗的150例患者按照随机数字表法分成三组,每组50例。三组病例术后均早期夹闭4h,夹闭结束后接不同引流方式,其中负压组行负压引流,常压组行常压引流,正压组行引流管中段抬高正压引流。记录并比较三组间临床结果及检验指标。 [结果] 三组手术均顺利完成,三组术前术中临床资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。正压组术后总引流量及隐性失血量均显著低于其他两组(P<0.05)。术后相应时间点,三组术后切口痛VAS评分及髋围差异均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术前三组Hb、Hct、RBC水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后2d三组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且正压组显著高于其他两组(P<0.05)。三组患者术后输血率及切口愈合等级三组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 [结论] THA术后采用早期夹闭4h联合引流管中段抬高正压引流可有效减少术后失血量,且不增加切口痛及髋部肿胀,是一种简单有效可供临床选择的引流方式。

    Abstract:

    Abstract [Objective] To compare the effect of three drainage methods after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on postoperative blood loss. [Methods] From January 2018 to March 2022, a total of 150 patients who underwent THA treatment in Lu'an Hospital affiliated to Anhui Medical University were divided into three groups according to the randomized numerical table method, with 50 cases in each group. All three groups were clamped early for 4h after surgery, and were connected to different ways of drainage after clamping, including negative pressure drainage in the negative pressure group (NPG), atmospheric pressure drainage in the atmospheric pressure group (APG), and positive pressure drainage in the positive pressure group (PPG) by elevating the middle part of the drainage tube. The clinical results and test indexes were recorded and compared among the three groups. [Results] The surgery was completed successfully in all three groups, and the differences in the preoperative and intraoperative clinical data of the three groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The total postoperative drainage volume and hidden blood loss in the PPG were significantly lower than those in the other two groups (P<0.05). At the corresponding postoperative time points, the differences in postoperative incisional pain VAS scores and hip circumference among the three groups were not statistically different (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the levels of Hb, Hct, and RBC among the three groups before surgery (P>0.05), and the difference among the three groups was statistically significant among the three groups in the 2d postoperative period (P<0.05), and the PPG was significantly higher than the other two groups (P<0.05). Postoperative blood transfusion rate and incision healing grade of patients in the three groups had no statistically significant differences among the three groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] The use of early clamping for 4h combined with positive pressure drainage with mid-height elevation of the drain after THA was effective in reducing postoperative blood loss without increasing the incisional pain and hip swelling, is a simple and effective drainage method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:2023-07-24
  • 录用日期:2024-01-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: