磁共振IDEAL-IQ评价骨质疏松症有价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

苏州大学附属第一医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏省卫健委老年健康项目(LK2021017)


Magnetic resonance IDEAL-IQ has value in evaluating osteoporosis
Author:
Affiliation:

First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Fund Project:

the Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission’s Elderly Health Project(LK2021017)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究MRI IDEAL-IQ法测定腰椎骨髓脂肪含量(FF,%)对骨质疏松的临床诊断价值,并分析脂肪分数与骨密度、骨代谢指标之间的相关性。 [方法]收集2022年1月至2023年2月在我院骨科同时行腰椎常规序列及IDEAL-IQ序列扫描、双能X线骨密度仪检查及骨代谢指标检测的患者。测量并记录椎体(L1-L4)脂肪分数、骨密度与骨代谢指标的检测结果。按 T值,可将患者分成三组:骨量正常组、骨量降低组和骨质疏松组。三组间差异对比行单因素方差分析(ANOVA),三组内两两对比采取LSD法,FF值与BMD、BMI、PⅠNP、β-CTX的相关性分析采取Pearson法,最后经由ROC(受试对象工作特征曲线)对各种检测手段诊断OP的效能展开检验。 [结果]总共收集病例91例,骨量正常组15例、骨量降低组33例、骨质疏松组43例。三组之间 FF值和β-CTX有显著性差异(p<0.05), P I NP之间没有显著性差异(p>0.05)。骨质疏松组的 FF值与其他两组之间差异均有统计学显著(p<0.05),骨量降低组与骨量正常组之间的 P值为0.43(p>0.05),差异无统计学意义。骨量正常组的β-CTX水平与其他两组之间差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05),骨质疏松组与骨量降低组之间的P值为0.53(p>0.05),差异无统计学意义。FF值与BMD呈中度负相关(r=-0.396,p<0.05);FF值与β-CTX呈弱正相关(r=0.238, p<0.05);FF值与PⅠNP无相关性(r=0.081,p>0.05)。FF值的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.786,当诊断阈值为77.99%时,灵敏度和特异度相对最优,为86.00%,特异性为67.77%。 [结论]通过磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术成像的FF值与BMD、BMI负相关,与β-CTX成正相关,能够为临床上诊断骨质疏松症提供有价值的信息。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]To investigate the clinical diagnostic value of the MRI IDEAL-IQ method for the determination of bone marrow fat content (FF,%) in the lumbar spine for osteoporosis, and to analyze the correlation between fat fraction and bone mineral density and bone metabolic indexes. [Methods] Patients who underwent both conventional serial and IDEAL-IQ serial scans of the lumbar spine, dual-energy X-ray bone densitometry and bone metabolic index tests in the Department of Orthopedics of our hospital from January 2022 to February 2023 were collected. The results of vertebral body (L1-L4) fat fraction, bone density and bone metabolic indexes were measured and recorded. According to the T value, the patients could be divided into three groups: normal bone mass group, reduced bone mass group and osteoporosis group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the differences among the three groups. LSD method was used for pound-for-pair comparison among the three groups. Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation between FF values and BMD, BMI, PⅠNP and β-CTX. And finally, the efficacy of various tests in diagnosing OP was tested by ROC (subject operating characteristic curve). [Results] A total of 91 cases were collected, including 15 cases in the normal bone mass group, 33 cases in the reduced bone mass group and 43 cases in the osteoporosis group. There were significant differences in FF values and β-CTX (p0.05) among the three groups (p<0.05), but no significant differences in P I NP among the three groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in FF values between the osteoporosis group and the other two groups (p<0.05), and the P value between the reduced bone mass group and the normal bone mass group was 0.43 (p>0.05), with no statistically significant difference. The difference between β-CTX levels in the normal bone mass group and the other two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the p-value between the osteoporosis group and the reduced bone mass group was 0.53 (p > 0.05), with not statistically significant. FF values were moderately negatively correlated with BMD (r = -0.396, p < 0.05). FF values were weakly positively correlated with β-CTX (r = 0.238, p>0.05). There was no correlation between FF and PINP (r=0.081, p>0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of FF values was 0.786. When the diagnostic threshold was 77.99%, the sensitivity and specificity were relatively optimal, which were 86.00% and 67.77% respectively. [Conclusion] The FF values imaged by MRI IDEAL-IQ technique are negatively correlated with BMD and BMI and positively correlated with β-CTX, which can provide valuable information for the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-10
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-14
  • 录用日期:2023-07-13
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: