颈椎单椎体次全切除是否切除后纵韧带的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.兰州大学第一临床医学院;2.兰州大学第一医院;3.敦煌市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

智能响应性水凝胶联合不同细胞因子促进人脐带间充质干细胞用于软骨组织工程研究


Comparison of posterior longitudinal ligament resection versus preservation during anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University;2.The First Hospital of Lanzhou University;3.Dunhuang People'4.'5.s Hospital

Fund Project:

Intelligent responsive hydrogel combined with different cytokines to promote human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering research

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 [目的] 比较颈椎单椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)中后纵韧带切除与否的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2017年3月至2022年3月本院行颈椎单椎体ACCF的81例患者资料,38例保留后纵韧带(保留组),43例切除后纵韧带(切除组)。比较其围手术期、随访及影像资料。[结果] 所有患者均术程顺利,两组透视次数、切口总长度、下地行走时间、切口愈合等级及住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),切除组早期并发症发生率、手术时间及失血量明显大于保留组(P<0.05)。随访时间至少12个月,两组恢复完全负重活动时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随时间推进,两组的NDI、JOA评分及锥体束征均显著改善(P<0.05)。相应时间点,NDI评分、锥体束征的组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后切除组JOA评分显著高于保留组(P<0.05)。影像评估,术后,两组的颈椎前凸角及ROM均显著改善(P<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组最小椎管矢状径均显著增加,切除组增加更明显(P<0.05)。[结论]行颈椎单椎体ACCF时,仔细评估术前影像资料及术中情况后,一定情况下可切除后纵韧带,但应注意并发症。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of posterior longitudinal ligament resection versus preservation during anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). [Methods] This paper retrospectively studied the data of 81 patients who underwent single vertebral ACCF in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2022. 38 patients had preserved the posterior longitudinal ligament (preservation group) and 43 patients had resected the posterior longitudinal ligament (resection group), and patients’ data of pre-treatment, follow-up and imaging were analyzed. [Results] All patients’ surgeries were successful. The two groups’ differences in the number of fluoroscopy, total incision length, walking time, incision healing grade and the number of days in hospital were not significant (P>0.05). Compared to the preservation group, the resection group’s early complication rate, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss were markedly higher (P<0.05). Follow-up was more than 12 months, the two groups’ differences in the recovery time of full weight-bearing activities were not significant (P>0.05). With the progression of time, the two groups’ NDI score, JOA score and pyramidal tract sign were markedly improved (P<0.05). At the corresponding time points, the JOA score of the resection group was markedly bigger than that of the preservation group (P<0.05), but the differences in NDI score and pyramidal tract sign between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). In terms of imaging, Both groups’ cervical lordosis angle and cervical ROM were significantly improved (P<0.05), while their differences in the above indicators were not significant (P>0.05). Postoperative minimum spinal canal sagittal diameter was markedly increased in both groups, and was more obviously increased in resection group (P<0.05). [Conclusion] When performing single vertebral ACCF, the posterior longitudinal ligament can be removed in some cases after careful evaluation of preoperative imaging data and intraoperative conditions, but complications should be noted.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-09
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-01
  • 录用日期:2023-08-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: