手术与非手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位临床疗效的荟萃分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

延安大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

不同剂量局麻药收肌管远端阻滞对TKA后疼痛及康复影响


A meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation
Author:
Affiliation:

yanan university affiliated hospital

Fund Project:

Effects of different doses of local anesthetic distal adductor canal block on pain and recovery after TKA

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【目的】比较手术与非手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位临床疗效。【方法】检索建库至 2022年 6 月 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of science 、EMBASE、中国知网数据库、万方数据库及中国生物医学 (CBM) 数据库,收集关于比较手术与非手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位临床疗效的临床研究文献。根据纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、质量评价及资料提取,用RevMan 5.2软件进行荟萃分析。【结果 】共纳入17个研究,共1006例,荟萃分析结果:并发症方面 (P>0.05)、肩关节疼痛方面(P>0.05)、锁骨外侧骨溶解发生方面(P>0.05)、没有差异;肩锁关节关节炎发生(P<0.05)、感染发生(P<0.05)、异位骨化发生(P<0.05)、结局功能优良方面(P<0.05)、constant评分(P<0.05)非手术组优于手术组。【结论】在并发症、疼痛、肩锁关节溶骨等方面手术和保守治疗没有差别,但是在感染、肩锁关节炎、异位骨化、结局功能优良率、constant评分等方面,非手术治疗有明显优势。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】As to Cochrane Meta analysis,we determine the efficacy of operative and nonoperative Treatment of Rockwood Types III acromioclavicular joint dislocation【Methods】he data bases, such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, CNKI,Wanfang Data and CBM Data were searched for the comparison of clinical outcomes of traditional open and arthroscopic osteotomy for Haglund syndrome from the creating to June 2022. Literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rev?Man 5.2 was used to perform the meta-analysis of parameters related to the consequences.【Results】A total of 17 studies with a total of 1006 patients were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed no difference in complications (P>0.05), shoulder pain (P>0.05), and lateral clavicle osteolysis (P>0.05); The non-surgical group with acromioclavicular arthritis (P<0.05), infection (P<0.05), ectopic ossification (P<0.05), excellent outcome function (P<0.05), and constant score (P<0.05) were better than the surgical group.【 Conclusion】There was no difference between surgical and conservative treatment in complications, pain, and osteolysis of the acromioclavicular joint, but non-surgical treatment had obvious advantages in infection, acromioclavicular arthritis, ectopic ossification, excellent outcome function, and constant score.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-26
  • 最后修改日期:2023-04-20
  • 录用日期:2023-08-02
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: