新型腰椎固定支具治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京明基医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京市卫生科技发展专项基金项目(编号:YKK20215)


Clinical study on the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fracture with a new type of lumbar fixation brace
Author:
Affiliation:

Mingji Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探究新型腰椎固定支具对胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效 方法:选取50例胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者,随机分为支具治疗组(27例)和垫枕治疗组(23例)。分别观察两组患者治疗前、治疗后1周、治疗后3月的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS评分)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比、脊柱后凸角(spinal Cobb angle)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评分的变化情况。 结果:治疗前支具治疗组的VAS评分(7.5±0.9)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(66.7±7.5)、脊柱后凸Cobb角(18.9°±5.2°)及ODI评分(38.1±1.9)与垫枕治疗组的VAS评分(7.4±1.0)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(67.7±8.1)、Cobb角(18.6°±4.3°)及ODI评分(38.7±1.3)相比,无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗一周后,支具治疗组的VAS(3.5±0.5)、ODI(29.5±1.1)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(78.0±7.2)、Cobb角(12.8°±1.7°)和垫枕治疗组的VAS(4.1±0.9)、ODI(32.2±1.8)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(75.4±6.3)、Cobb角(13.8°±1.7°)均较治疗前改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),支具治疗组的改善幅度大于垫枕治疗组,差异有显著性(p<0.05)。治疗3月后,支具治疗组的VAS(1.9±0.7)、ODI(13.5±1.2)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(93.1±4.3)、Cobb角(10.2°±0.7°)和垫枕治疗组的VAS(2.0±0.8)、ODI(13.8±1.1)、伤椎椎体前缘高度比(88.3±3.8)、Cobb角(12.1°±0.9°)均较治疗一周时改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组之间的VAS、ODI评分无显著差异(P>0.05),两组之间的伤椎椎体前缘高度比、Cobb角有明显差异(P<0.05)。 结论:新型腰椎固定支具可有效改善胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者的伤椎高度和后凸Cobb角,缓解疼痛,提高患者生活质量,具有良好的社会效益,值得推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective :To sutdy the efficacy of the new type of lumbar fixation brace on simple thoracic and lumbar fractures. Methods:A total of 50 patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures were randomly divided into the brace treatment group(27 patients) and the simple treatment group(23 patients). The changes of the visual analog score (VAS),the height ratio of anterior margin of the injured vertebral body ,spinal Cobb angle ( Cobb angle) and oswestry disability index(ODI) of the two group were observed before treatment, one week and three month after treatment.Results: Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the VAS score (7.5 ± 0.9), the height ratio of anterior margin of the injured vertebral body (66.7 ± 7.5), spinal Cobb angle (18.9 °± 5.2 °) and the ODI score (38.1 ± 1.9) of the brace treatment group and the VAS score (7.4 ± 1.0), the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body (67.73 ± 8.12), spinal Cobb angle (18.6°± 4.3°) and the ODI score (38.7 ± 1.3) of the lumber pillow treatment group (P>0.05).After one week of treatment,the VAS score (3.5±0.5), ODI score (29.5±1.1), the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body (78.0±7.2), Cobb Angle (12.8°±1.7°) of the brace treatment group and the VAS score (4.1±0.9), ODI score (32.2±1.8), the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body (75.4±6), Cobb Angle (13.8°±1.7°) of the lumber pillow treatment group were better than before treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).Compared with the lumber pillow treatment group, the improvement of the brace treatment group was more obvious, with a significant difference (P<0.05).After three mouths of treatment,the VAS score (1.9±0.7), ODI score (13.5±1.2), the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body (93.1±4.3), Cobb Angle (10.2°±0.7°) of the brace treatment group and the VAS score (2.0±0.8), ODI score (13.8±1.1), the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body (88.3±3.8), Cobb Angle (12.1°±0.9°) of the lumber pillow treatment group were better than those in the 1st week after treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The scores of VAS、ODI between the two groups were no significant difference (p>0.05),but the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body and Cobb Angle between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusion: The new lumbar fixation brace can effectively improve the height of injured vertebrae and kyphotic Cobb Angle in patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures, relieve pain, improve the quality of life of patients, and has good social benefits, which is worthy of promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03
  • 最后修改日期:2023-02-03
  • 录用日期:2023-03-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: