UBE内镜下责任节段椎管减压治疗老年退变性腰椎椎管狭窄
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

庆阳市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients by unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of responsible spinal canal
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Qingyang People'2.'3.s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [摘要] 目的:回顾性研究单侧双通道内镜下责任节段椎管减压治疗老年退变性腰椎椎管狭窄的临床疗效。方法:选择2018年1月至2021年3月在我院收治的65例腰椎管狭窄症患者临床资料,其中单侧双通道组(UBE组)28例和传统组37例。比较两组围手术期数据(包括手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、切口长度、卧床时间等),术前、术后1个月、术后3个月功视觉模拟评分评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数,术前及术后CT测量椎管截面积、侧隐窝直径。结果:①UBE组手术时间显著高于传统组(P<0.001),术中出血量、住院时间、切口长度、卧床时间及并发症均显著少于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②所有患者均获得随访,随访时间12-16个月,平均14.12±1.05个月。随访期间未发生骨质疏松性椎体骨折及无再次手术患者。两组患者术前VAS评分、ODI评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月,UBE组的VAS评分、ODI评分显著优于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月及末次随访时,两组患者VAS评分、ODI评分无显著差异(P>0.05),均显著优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。③传统组椎体间融合时间平均为3.41±1.08个月。术前侧隐窝直径、椎管截面积无显著差异(P>0.05),术后两组患者侧隐窝直径、椎管截面均显著增加优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组之间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:单侧双通道内镜下责任节段椎管减压治疗老年退变性腰椎椎管狭窄短期临床效果显著,可有效缓解疼痛,改善患者生活质量。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of the responsible spinal canal in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LDSS) in the elderly. Methods 65 cases with LDSS admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021 were selected.Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression group (UBE group) 28 cases and traditional operation group 37 cases. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared (including operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, incision length, bed rest time, etc.), visual simulation score(VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI), vertebral canal cross-sectional area(CSA) and the diameter of the lateral recess before and after operation. Results ① The operation time of UBE group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group (P<0.001), and the intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, incision length, bedtime and complications were significantly lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.05). ② All patients were followed up for 12-16 months, with an average of 14.12 ± 1.05 months. There was no osteoporotic vertebral fracture or reoperation during the follow-up period. 1 month after operation, the VAS score and ODI score of UBE group were significantly better than those of traditional group (P<0.05). 3 months after operation and at the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI score between the two groups (P>0.05), which were significantly better than those before operation (P<0.001). ③ The average time of interbody fusion in the traditional group was 3.41 ± 1.08 months. There was no significant difference in the diameter of the lateral recess and CSA before operation (P>0.05). The diameter of the lateral recess and the CSA in the two groups were significantly increased after operation than before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of the responsible spinal canal has significant short-term clinical effect on senile degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, which could effectively relieve pain and improve the quality of life .

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-04
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-30
  • 录用日期:2023-06-01
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: