全髋关节置换人工智能三维术前规划的临床应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

柳州市工人医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical application of artificial intelligence three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Liuzhou worker'2.'3.s hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨人工智能辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)三维规划系统(AIHIP)在THA中的临床意义,评估该系统在临床实际应用中的准确性和临床价值。方法:选择2020 年3月-2022年1月拟行单侧初次THA的112例患者,分别使用 AIHIP 系统(智能组)和二维模板测量(常规组)进行术前规划。比较两组患者围手术期资料、术中应用假体与术前规划的匹配程度,比较两组患者术后Harris评分、VAS评分及髋屈-伸活动度(ROM),并对两组患者术后影像学结果进行分析与评价。结果:智能组假体符合率显著高于常规组,手术时间较常规组缩短(P<0.05)。两组患者术后Harris评分、VAS评分及ROM均优于术前;术后1、6个月,智能组Harris评分、VAS评分及ROM均优于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后智能组纵向HCOR距离差及横向HCOR距离差均小于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组LLD比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后两组髋臼假体前倾角、外展角比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:AIHIP系统辅助下THA术前规划准确率高,能有效帮助重建髋关节旋转中心,缩短手术时间,早期恢复髋关节功能。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the clinical significance of the AI-assisted 3 D planning system (AIHIP) in THA, and to evaluate the accuracy and clinical value of the system in the clinical practical application. Methods: Among the 112 patients proposed to undergo THA from March 2020 to January 2022, 74 patients were preplanned using the AIHIP system (Intelligent group) and 38 patients using film templating measurement (Conventional group). The perioperative data, the matching degree between the intraoperative prosthesis and the preoperative planning prosthesis were compared, the postoperative Harris score, VAS score and hip flexion-extension activity (ROM) of the two groups were compared, and the postoperative imaging results of the two groups were analyzed and evaluated. Results: The prosthesis compliance rate was significantly higher than the conventional group, and the operation time was shorter than the conventional group (P <0.05). The Harris scores, VAS scores and ROM of the two groups were better than those before surgery. At 1 and 6 months after surgery, the Harris score, VAS score and ROM in the intelligent group were better than those in the conventional group, with a statistically significant difference (P <0.05). After surgery, the difference between longitudinal HCOR distance and transverse HCOR distance of intelligent group were smaller than that of conventional group, which was statistically significant (P <0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the LLD (P> 0.05) and the forward inclination and abduction angle of the acetabular components (P> 0.05). Conclusions: The preoperative planning assisted by AIHIP system has high accuracy, which can effectively help reconstruct the hip rotation center and shorten the operation time, and help the early recovery of hip function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-31
  • 最后修改日期:2023-02-25
  • 录用日期:2023-07-13
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: