胫骨横向骨搬移联合介入治疗重度下肢动脉硬化闭塞症
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.广西医科大学第一附属医院骨关节外科;2.广西医科大学第一附属医院血管外科;3.广西糖尿病足保肢工程研究中心;4.广西医科大学再生医学与医用生物资源开发应用省部共建协同创新中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

基金项目:国家自然科学基金 (82060406,81601930);中国博士后科学基金 (2019M650235); 广西医科大学高水平创新团队及杏湖学者计划;广西壮族自治区自然科学基金 (2017GXNSFAA198318);广西壮族自治区南宁市青秀区重点研发计划 (2021003, 2020053);广西医科大学第一附属医院临床研究攀登计划 (YYZS2020010)。


Tibia Transverse Transport combined with endovascular intervention for the treatment of severe lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China;2.Department of vascular surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China;3.Guangxi Diabetic foot Salvage Engineering Research Center;4.Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry, Guangxi Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 比较胫骨横向骨搬移(TTT)联合介入与单纯介入治疗重度下肢动脉硬化闭塞症(ASO)的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2018年5月-2021年1月于我院收治疗的86例重度ASO(Rutherford分级5或6级)患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法分为介入组(n=40)及介入+TTT组(n=46)。两组患者性别、年龄、Rutherford分级等一般资料无显著差异(P>0.05)。比较两组临床与影响检查结果。[结果] 两组手术均顺利完成,未出现严重手术并发症。患者均获随访,随访9~24个月,平均(18.5±4.7)个月。与介入组相比,介入+TTT组愈合率增高,愈合时间、住院时间、抗生素使用时间缩短,复发率、小截肢率、术后清创次数降低(P<0.05)。与术前相比,术后3个月两组的VAS评分均显著降低(P<0.05),且术后3个月时介入+TTT组的VAS评分低于介入组(P<0.05)。术后3个月两组血管显像均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),且术后3个月时介入+TTT组的血管显像优于介入组(P<0.05)。两组患者大截肢率、死亡率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。[结论] 介入联合TTT治疗下肢重度ASO显著提高愈合率,降低复发率、愈合时间、住院时间、抗生素使用时间、术后清创次数和疼痛,而无明显手术并发症,是一种有效和安全的治疗方法。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the clinical effect of Tibia Transverse Transport (TTT) combined with endovascular intervention with endovascular intervention alone in the treatment of severe lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO). [Methods] The clinical data of 86 patients with severe ASO (Rutherford grade 5 or 6) treated in our hospital from May 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into the intervention + TTT group (n=46) and intervention group (n=40) according to the treatment. There were no significant differences in general data such as gender, age, and ASO grade between the two groups (P>0.05). The clinical and imaging examination results of the two groups were compared. [Results] The operations of both groups were successfully completed without serious surgical complications. All patients were followed up for 9 to 24 months, with an average of (18.5±4.7) months. Compared with the intervention group, the intervention + TTT group had higher healing rate, shorter healing time, length of hospital stay, and duration of antibiotic therapy, lower recurrence rate and minor amputation rate, fewer postoperative debridement (P<0.05). Compared with preoperatively, VAS scores of both groups were significantly lower 3 months postoperatively (P<0.05), and the VAS score of the intervention + TTT group 3 months postoperatively was lower than that of the intervention group (P<0.05). Compared with preoperatively, the angiography classification in both groups was significantly improved 3 months postoperatively (P<0.05), and the angiography classification in the intervention+TTT group was better than that in the intervention group 3 months postoperatively (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in major amputation rate and mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] Endovascular intervention combined with TTT in the treatment of severe lower extremity ASO can significantly improve the healing rate, reduce the recurrence rate, healing time, length of hospital stay, duration of antiinfection therapy, postoperative debridement, and pain while without obvious surgical complications. Thus, it is an effective and safe treatment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-14
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-13
  • 录用日期:2023-05-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: