股骨颈系统与空心钉固定股骨颈骨折的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

徐州市中医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of the femoral neck system versus hollow nail-fixed femoral neck fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xuzhou

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 比较股骨颈系统(femoral neck system,FNS)FNS组与空心钉(cannulated screw,CS)CS组固定股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2020年2月-2021年2月于我院行内固定手术治疗的股骨颈骨折50例。依据术前沟通结果,分为FNS组 25例、CS组25例,统计分析两组围手术期资料、随访资料及影像评估资料。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,均获得随访。FNS组的手术时间、术中透视次数、导针定位次数及下地行走时间均优于CS组(P<0.05)。在切口总长度及术中失血量方面,CS组更具优势(P<0.05)。两组住院时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后随访,FNS组患者在术后完全负重活动时间、Harris评分均优于CS组(P<0.05);两组在同一时间点的髋伸-屈ROM、髋内旋-外旋ROM无明显差异(P>0.05);两组患者术后的Harris评分、髋伸-屈ROM、髋内旋-外旋ROM均较术前有显著提高(P<0.05)。在影像评估方面,FNS组与CS组在Garden对线指数、颈干角角度、Tonnis髋退变分级方面无显著差异(P>0.05),组内不同时间点比较时颈干角角度、Tonnis髋退变分级方面亦无显著差异(P>0.05),但二者术前术后的Garden对线指数有显著差异(P<0.05)。[结论]在股骨颈骨折治疗中,FNS具有手术时间短、稳定性强、髋关节功能恢复好、骨折愈合快等优点。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of fixed femoral neck fracture in femoral neck system FNS group and cannulated screw (CS) CS group. [Methods] A retrospective analysis was performed for 50 cases of femoral neck fracture treated by internal fixation surgery in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021. According to the results of preoperative communication, 25 cases were divided into FNS group and 25 cases in CS group, and perioperative data, follow-up data and imaging evaluation data of the two groups were statistically analyzed. [Results] Both groups successfully completed the surgery and were followed up. The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy, guide needle positioning and walking time of the FNS group were better than those of the CS group (P<0.05). The CS group had more advantages in terms of total incision length and intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). At postoperative follow-up, the FNS group had better postoperative complete weightbearing activity time and Harris score than CS group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in hip extension-flexion ROM and hip internal rotation-external rotation ROM at the same time point between the two groups (P>0.05). The Harris score, hip extension-flexion ROM, and hip internal rotation-external rotation ROM were significantly improved between the two groups compared with the preoperative period (P<0.05). In terms of image evaluation, there were no significant differences between the FNS group and the CS group in terms of Garden alignment index, neck trunk angle angle, and Tonnis hip degeneration grade (P>0.05), and there were no significant differences in neck trunk angle angle and Tonnis hip degeneration grade when comparing different time points in the group (P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the Garden alignment index before and after surgery (P<0.05). [Conclusion] In the treatment of femoral neck fracture, FNS has the advantages of short operation time, strong stability, good recovery of hip function, and fast fracture healing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-18
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-07
  • 录用日期:2023-02-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: