聚醚醚酮棒椎弓根螺钉系统在三节段腰椎退行性疾病治疗中的应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京中医药大学第一临床医学院;2.北京中医药大学东直门医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

潍坊奥精仿生骨多中心临床研究项目,项目名称:仿生矿化胶原人工骨在脊柱疾病及骨折治疗中的疗效观察


Application of PEEK rod pedicle screw system for non-fusion fixation in the treatment of three-level lumbar degenerative diseases
Author:
Affiliation:

1.First Clinical Medical College of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine;2.Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探讨PEEK棒椎弓根螺钉系统非融合固定联合椎管减压治疗三节段腰椎退行性疾病的可行性。[方法] 前瞻性收集2018年1月至2019年12月符合纳入排除标准的三节段腰椎退行性疾病患者62例,根据术前知情沟通,分为非融合组(n=30)和融合组(n=32)。比较两组围手术期、随访及影像结果。[结果] 两组术后引流量、切口长度、切口愈合等级、下地行走时间、住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。非融合组手术时间及术中出血量低于融合组(P<0.05)。两组VAS评分、ODI指数及LSDI评分较术前均有改善(P<0.05),术后各随访时间点,两组VAS评分和ODI指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组LSDI评分术后3个月差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)、术后12个月及末次随访时非融合组组优于融合组(P<0.05)。非融合组术后12个月及末次随访时固定节段ROM大于融合组(P>0.05)。末次随访时,非融合组上邻节段ROM小于融合组(P<0.05),非融合组上相邻节段椎间盘Pfirrmann分级优于融合组(P<0.05)。[结论] PEEK棒非融合固定与钛棒融合固定联合椎管减压治疗三节段腰椎退行性疾病均取得良好的临床疗效;非融合术后能保留固定节段部分活动度、患者腰背部僵硬感较轻,对邻近节段间盘退变影响相对较小。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the feasibility of PEEK rod pedicle screw system non-fusion fixation combined with spinal canal decompression in the treatment of three-level lumbar degenerative diseases. [Methods] From January 2018 to December 2019, 62 patients with three-levels lumbar degenerative diseases who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were prospectively collected. According to preoperative informed communication, they were divided into non-fusion group (n=30) and fusion group (n=32). The perioperative, follow-up and imaging results were compared between the two groups. [Results] There were no significant differences in postoperative drainage volume, incision length, incision healing grades, postoperative walking time and hospital stay between the two groups(p>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of non-fusion group were lower than those of fusion group(p<0.05), and there was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volume between the two groups(p>0.05). VAS score, ODI index and LSDI score of the two groups were improved compared with those before operation(p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at each follow-up time point after operation(p>0.05); There was no significant difference in LSDI scores between the two groups at 3 months after operation(p>0.05), the non-fusion group was better than the fusion group at 12 months and last follow-up(p<0.05). The fixed segment ROM of the non-fusion group was greater than that of the fusion group at 12 months and last follow-up(p<0.05). At last follow-up, the upper adjacent segment ROM of the non-fusion group was smaller than that of the fusion group(p<0.05), and the Pfirrmann grade of the adjacent intervertebral disc in the non-fusion group was better than that in the fusion group(p<0.05). [Conclusion] PEEK rod non-fusion fixation and titanium rod fusion fixation combined with spinal canal decompression in the treatment of three-levels of lumbar degenerative diseases achieved good clinical efficacy. Non-fusion can retain partial fixed segment range of motion, reduce the stiffness of the patient's back, and have relatively little effect on the degeneration of adjacent segment intervertebral disc.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-04
  • 最后修改日期:2022-10-13
  • 录用日期:2023-02-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: