缝合锚修复三角韧带治疗踝关节骨折伴内侧损伤效果分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

内蒙古自治区人民医院骨关节外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The effectofsutureanchorrepairing deltoid ligament inthetreatmentofankle fracture with medial injury
Author:
Affiliation:

1.People&2.#39;3.&4.s Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 比较切开复位内固定术联合或不联合缝合锚修复三角韧带对踝关节骨折伴内侧损伤的治疗效果。[方法] 回顾性分析2015年1月—2020年12月本院收治的踝关节三角韧带断裂患者76例。依据术前医患沟通结果,将患者分为两组。其中,38例患者采用切开复位内固定术同时行三角韧带缝合锚修复,另外38例患者仅行切开复位内固定术,未修复三角韧带。比较两组患者围手术期、随访和影像资料。[结果] 78例患者均顺利完成手术,未发生严重并发症。修复组在手术时间、切口总长度、术中失血量均显著大于未修复组(P<0.05),但住院时间和骨折愈合时间显著早于未缝合组(P<0.05)。所有患者随访12~28个月,平均(18.72±4.62)个月。未修复组2例患者因疼痛和功能障碍行翻修踝关节修复术。修复组患者恢复完全负重显著早于未修复组(P<0.05);随术后时间推移,两组患者VAS评分显著降低(P<0.05),而AOFAS评分、踝背伸-跖屈ROM和踝足内翻-外翻ROM均显著增加(P<0.05);相时间点,修复组在VAS评分显著低于未修复组(P<0.05);AOFAS评分、踝背伸-跖屈ROM和踝足内翻-外翻ROM显著大于未修复组(P<0.05)。影像方面,末次随访时修复组MCS和TT显著低于未修复组(P<0.05); 修复组所有患者TT角均矫正为正常角度(≤4°),而未修复组有6例患者TT角未矫正到正常角度(P<0.05)。[结论] 采用缝合锚修复三角韧带治疗有利于改善踝部骨折伴三角韧带损伤的临床效果。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the therapeutic effect of open reduction and internal fixation combined with or without suture anchor in repairing the deltoid ligament for ankle fracture with medial injury. [Methods] A retrospective analysis was performed on 76 patients with ankle deltoid ligament fracture admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. Based on the results of preoperative doctor-patient communication, the patients were divided into two groups. Among them, 38 patients underwent ORIF for fractures combined with deltoid ligment repaired, while the remaining 38 patients had ORIF only without deltoid ligament repaired. The perioperative, follow-up and imaging data were compared between the two groups. [Results] All the 78 patients had operation completed successfully without serious complications. The repaired group was significantly greater than the unrepaired group in term of operation time, total incision length, and intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05), but the length of hospital stay and time of fracture union were significantly earlier than those in the unrepaired group(P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 12-28 months, with an average of (18.72±4.62) months.Two patients in the unrepaired group underwent revision ankle arthroplasty due to pain and dysfunction. The patients in the repair group recovered to full weight bearing significantly earlier than those in the unrepaired group (P<0.05). The VAS score decreased significantly (P<0.05), while the AOFAS score and ankle dorsiflexion-plantar flexion ROM and ankle and foot varus-valgus ROM increased significantly over time postoperatively in both groups (P<0.05). However, the repaired group had proved significantly superior to the unrepaired group at the corresponding time point in the AOFAS scores, ankle dorsiflexion-plantar flexion ROM and ankle and foot varus-valgus ROM (P<0.05), despite of the fact that the repaired group had significantly less VAS scores than the unrepaired group (P<0.05). MCS and TT in the repaired group were significantly lower than those in the unrepaired group at the last follow-up (P<0.05). TT angles of all patients in the repair group were corrected to normal Angle (≤4°), while those of 6 patients in the non-repair group were not corrected to normal Angle (P<0.05). [Conclusion] The suture anchor repairing is beneficial to improve the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for ankle fracture with deltoid ligament injury

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-22
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-18
  • 录用日期:2022-10-26
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: