比较OLIF与PT-Endo-TLIF治疗对退行性腰椎滑脱患者腰椎功能及椎间隙高度的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

东部战区总医院镇江医疗区

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of the effects of OLIF and PT-Endo-TLIF on lumbar function and intervertebral space height in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Spine Surgery, Zhenjiang Medical District, Eastern Theater General Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较退行性腰椎滑脱患者给予斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与经皮脊柱内镜辅助下腰椎后路融合术(PT-Endo-TLIF)治疗对腰椎功能及椎间隙高度的影响。方法:选取2020年9月至2021年10月东部战区总医院镇江医疗区骨科收治的共计82例退行[ 曹华,1981年-,籍贯江苏海门,副主任医师,研究方向:脊柱外科疾病]性腰椎滑脱患者,按照随机数字表法分成观察组(41例)与对照组(41例),观察组采取OLIF治疗,对照组采取PT-Endo-TLIF治疗,比较两组手术相关指标、疼痛程度、腰椎功能、椎间隙高度、血清指标及并发症发生率。结果:观察组与对照组相比术中失血量、术后引流量明显更少(P<0.05),手术时间、下地活动时间、住院时间明显更短(P<0.05);观察组与对照组相比术后1周、3个月视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分明显更低(P<0.05),两组术后6个月VAS评分比较无明显差异(P>0.05);两组术后3个月腰椎日本骨科协会(JOA)评分明显提高(P<0.05),Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)明显降低(P<0.05),两组术后3个月腰椎JOA评分、ODI比较无明显差异(P>0.05);两组术后3个月椎间隙高度均明显提高(P<0.05),观察组与对照组相比明显更高(P<0.05);两组术后1d红细胞沉降率(ESR)、降钙素原(PCT)、β-内啡肽(β-EP)水平均明显提高(P<0.05),但观察组与对照组相比明显更低(P<0.05);观察组(7.32%)与对照组(24.29%)相比并发症发生率明显更低(P<0.05)。结论:两种手术方式治疗退行性腰椎滑脱患者均能够改善腰椎功能,但与PT-Endo-TLIF比较,给予OLIF治疗更能够改善手术相关指标,减轻患者疼痛,改善椎间隙高度,维持血清指标的稳定,减少并发症的发生。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To compare the effect of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and percutaneous endoscopic posterior lower lumbar fusion (PT-Endo-TLIF) on lumbar function and intervertebral space height in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis Influence. Methods: A total of 82 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who were admitted in the Department of Orthopedics, Zhenjiang Medical District, Eastern Theater General Hospital from September 2020 to October 2021 were selected and they were divided into the observation group (41 cases) and the control group (41 cases) according to the random number table method. The control group was received OLIF treatment, and the control group received PT-Endo-TLIF treatment. The operation-related indexes, pain degree, lumbar spine function, intervertebral space height, serum indexes and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume of the observation group were significantly less (P<0.05), and the operation time, the time of going to the ground, and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group was significantly lower at 1 week and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the VAS score between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P>0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of lumbar spine at 3 months was significantly improved (P<0.05), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was significantly decreased (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in lumbar spine JOA score and ODI at 3 months after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The height of the intervertebral space in the two groups 3 months after operation was significantly increased (P<0.05), and compared with the contro group, the observation group was significantly higher (P<0.05). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), β-endorphin (β-EP) levels were significantly increased (P<0.05), but compared with the contro group, the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group (24.29%), the observation group (7.32%) had a significantly lower complication rate (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both surgical methods can improve lumbar spine function in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, but compared with PT-Endo-TLIF, OLIF treatment can improve surgery-related indicators, relieve pain, improve intervertebral space height, and maintain the stability of serum indicators, and reduce the occurrence of complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-14
  • 最后修改日期:2022-04-14
  • 录用日期:2022-09-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: