股骨颈动力交叉钉固定股骨颈骨折的荟萃分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东大学;2.山东大学附属济南市中心医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Meta-analysis of femoral neck fracture treated with dynamic cross pin system
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shandong University;2.Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, Key Program, Major Research Plan)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 系统评价股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(Femoral Neck System,FNS)治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 检索PubMed、CNKI、Cochranelibrary、Wanfang、VIP数据库、Embase、CBM、ChiCTR数据库,收集FNS治疗股骨颈骨折的文献,检索时间:2017年1月至2021年12月。质量评估、数据资料提取由2位研究者各自独立完成,使用RevMan 5.4软件完成荟萃分析。[结果] 纳入9项回顾性队列研究,共700位患者。分析结果显示:FNS治疗股骨颈骨折在手术时间(P<0.05)、术中透视次数(P<0.05)、骨折愈合时间(P<0.05)、6个月后髋关节功能(P<0.05)、股骨颈短缩率(P<0.05)方面均优于传统内固定装置空心螺钉(Cannulated Screws,CS),但术中出血量(P<0.05)较CS多。在股骨头坏死率(P>0.05)、骨不连发生率(P>0.05)方面,二者差异无统计学意义。[结论] FNS治疗股骨颈骨折有利于减少手术时间、术中透视次数、骨折愈合时间、股骨颈短缩的发生率,改善术后6个月髋关节功能的恢复,临床效果显著,但在术中出血量方面略多于CS。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of Femoral Neck System in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.[METHODS] PubMed, CNKI, Cochranelibrary, Wanfang, VIP database, Embase, CBM and ChiCTR databases were searched to collect the literatures on FNS for the treatment of femoral neck fracture from January 2017 to December 2021. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two authors respectively. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software after collating the data. [Results]A total of 700 patients with 9 retrospective cohort studies were included in this study. The analysis results that FNS was superior to Conventional instrumented cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in terms of operation time (P< 0.05),fluoroscopy times (P<0.05) , fracture healing time (P<0.05) , hip function after 6 months (P<0.05) and femoral neck shortening rate (P<0.05) , but FNS had more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05) than CS. There was no significant difference between FNS and CS in terms of femoral head necrosis rate (P>0.05) and incidence of nonunion (P>0.05) . [Conclusion]FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture is beneficial in reducing the operation time, fluoroscopy times , fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening rate, and improving the recovery of hip function after 6 months, with significant clinical effect, but slightly more intraoperative blood loss than CS.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-21
  • 最后修改日期:2022-04-10
  • 录用日期:2022-07-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: