膝骨性关节炎3D打印导板与传统胫骨高位截骨比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

安徽医科大学第二附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年项目(编号:81702656);安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(编号:201904b11020032);安徽医科大学基础与临床合作研究提升计划(编号:2020xkjT040) ;安徽医科大学第二附属医院临床研究培育计划项目(编号:2020LCZD20)


Comparison of 3D printed patient-specific instrumentation and traditional high tibial osteotomy in knee osteoarthritis
Author:
Affiliation:

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探讨3D打印个性化导板(patient-specific instrumentation,PSI)辅助胫骨高位截骨(high tibial osteotomy,HTO)治疗内翻型膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis, KOA)的精准度和疗效,并与传统截骨方法进行比较。[方法] 回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年2月在我院骨科行内侧开放楔形HTO治疗的KOA患者35例,根据是否使用3D打印PSI分为两组:3D组(17例)采用3D打印PSI辅助截骨;传统组(18例)采用传统方法截骨。比较两组围术期情况、随访和影像资料。[结果] 3D组的手术切口总长度、手术时间、术中失血量、术中透视次数、下地行走时间和术后住院时间均显著优于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。传统组的早期并发症发生率虽高于3D组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访时间12~18个月,平均(14.34±2.03)个月。3D组恢复完全负重活动时间比传统组稍早,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),随着时间推移,两组患者的VAS评分、HSS评分和膝关节伸屈ROM均显著改善(P<0.05)。术后6个月和12个月随访时,3D组的WBLR和MPTA均显著大于传统组(P<0.05),两组术后的膝骨关节炎K-L分级均较术前明显改善(P<0.05)。[结论] 相比传统方法截骨,3D打印PSI辅助的内侧开放楔形HTO,术中透视次数更少,手术时间更短,截骨更精准,下肢力线矫正更理想。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the accuracy and efficacy of 3D printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) assisted high tibial osteotomy(HTO) in varus knee osteoarthritis(KOA), and to compare with traditional osteotomy. [Method] 35 patients with KOA who underwent medial open wedge HTO in the Department of orthopaedics of our hospital from January 2019 to February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups: 3D group (17 cases) underwent 3D printing PSI assisted osteotomy; The traditional group (18 cases) underwent traditional osteotomy. The perioperative conditions, follow-up and imaging data were compared between the two groups.[Results] The total length of surgical incision, operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopy times, ground walking time and postoperative hospital stay in the 3D group were significantly better than the traditional group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of early complications in the traditional group was higher than the 3D group, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The mean follow-up time was (14.34±2.03) months from 12 to 18 months. The 3D group returned to full weight-bearing activity earlier than the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant. VAS score, HSS score and knee extension ROM in 2 groups were significantly improved over time (P<0.05). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, WBLR and MPTA in the 3D group were significantly higher than the traditional group (P<0.05), and the K-L grading of knee osteoarthritis in both groups was significantly improved after operation (P<0.05). [Conclusion] Compared with conventional osteotomy, 3D printed PSI assisted OWHTO has fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy, shorter operative time, more accurate osteotomy, and lower limb line correction is more ideal.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-16
  • 最后修改日期:2022-02-22
  • 录用日期:2022-04-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: