钢板与克氏针固定Bennett骨折的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.湖北省中医院;2.中部战区总医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

湖北省卫生健康委员会项目(项目编号:WJ2021M182)


Comparison of Bennett fracture fixed with plate and K-wire
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Hubei University of Chinese Medicine;2.General Hospital of Central Theater Command

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 [目的] 比较切开复位钢板固定与闭合复位克氏针固定治疗Bennett骨折的临床效果。[方法] 回顾性分析本院2015年01月—2019年01月收治的52例Bennett骨折患者,依据术前医患沟通结果,28例采用切开复位钢板固定手术(钢板组),24例采用闭合复位克氏针固定手术(克氏针组)。比较两组围手术期、随访与影像资料。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,围手术期方面,两组手术时间、住院时间、切口愈合、并发症的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术中透视次数,钢板组优于克氏针组,术中失血量,克氏针组优于钢板组(P<0.05)。随访结果,两组术后完全负重时间、术后3月、1年VAS评分,术后1年DASH评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但是,两组患者术后主动活动时间、术后3月DASH评分钢板组明显优于克氏针组(P<0.05)。影像方面,两组患者术后骨折愈合时间差异无显著差异(P>0.05)。但是,术后骨折对合与第一掌腕对线,钢板组均显著优于克氏针组(P<0.05)。[结论] 两种术式治疗Bennett骨折均可获得良好疗效,各具优缺点,但是切开复位钢板固定复位准确,固定牢靠,术后可让患者早期进行功能锻炼、更快恢复患肢功能。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To Comparison the clinical effects of two surgical options for Bennett fracture—open reduction and fixation with locking plate vs. closed reduction and fixation Kirschner wires. [Methods] 52 patients with Bennett fracture treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the results of preoperative doctor-patient communication, 28 patients were treated with open reduction and fixation with locking plate (plate group) and 24 patients with closed reduction and fixation Kirschner wires (K-wire group). The perioperative period, follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared. [Results] all the patients in the two groups completed the operation successfully, and there was no significant difference in perioperative time, hospital stay, incision healing and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy in the plate group was better than that in the K- group, and the intraoperative blood loss in the Kirschner wire group was better than that in the plate group (P < 0.05). According to the follow-up results, there was no significant difference in the time of complete weight bearing, VAS score at 3 months and 1 year after operation, and DASH score at 1 year after operation between the two groups. However, the active activity time and DASH score 3 months after operation in the plate group were significantly better than those in the K-wire group. In terms of imaging, there was no significant difference in postoperative fracture healing time between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the alignment of the fracture and the first carpometacarpal joint in the plate group was significantly better than that in the K-wire group (P < 0.05). [Conclusion] Both of the two methods can achieve good results in the treatment of Bennett fracture, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, but the open reduction and plate fixation is accurate and reliable, and the patients can take early functional exercise and recover the function of the affected limb more quickly after operation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:2022-05-06
  • 录用日期:2022-09-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: