外固定架与钢板内固定治疗肱骨投弹骨折比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国人民解放军中部战区空军医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of external fixator and plate internal fixation in the treatment of throwing humeral fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Central Theater Command

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 目的:比较外固定架与钢板内固定治疗肱骨投弹骨折患者的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月-2020年1月60例肱骨投弹骨折患者纳入本研究,依据医患沟通结果,30例采用外固定架固定(外固定组),30例采用钢板内固定(内固定组)。比较两组术前一般资料、围手术期情况、随访结果和影像资料。结果:术中桡神经损伤外固定组为 1/30,内固定组为 6/30,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。外固定组切口长度和术中出血量显著优于钢板组(P<0.05);两组病例均获得随访12-18个月,平均14.23±1.89个月。外固定组术后开始主动活动时间和完全负重活动时间显著早于钢板组P<0.05)。随术后时间推移,两组患者肘伸屈ROM 及MEPS评分均显著增加,术后相应时间点,两组间肩上举ROM及 Constant-Murley 评分差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),但外固定组肘屈伸ROM及MEPS评分均显著优于内固定组(P<0.05)。影像显示两组患者骨折复位质量的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但外固定组骨折愈合时间显著早于内固定组(P<0.05)。结论:外固定架与钢板内固定均为治疗肱骨投弹骨折的较好方法。外固定架固定具有手术创伤小、并发症少的优势,骨折可早期愈合。

    Abstract:

    Abstract [Objective]: To compare the clinical effect of external fixator and plate internal fixation in the treatment of throwing humeral fractures. [Methods]: A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 patients with humeral projectile fracture from January 2016 to January 2020. According to doctor-patient communication results, 30 patients were treated with external fixator (external fixation group) and 30 patients were treated with plate internal fixation (internal fixation group). The preoperative general data, perioperative conditions, follow-up results and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results] : The rate of radial nerve injury was 1/30 in the external fixation group and 6/30 in the internal fixation group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Incision length and intraoperative blood loss in external fixation group were significantly better than those in plate group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up for 12-18 months, with an average of 14.23 ±1.89 months. The time of active activity and full weight-bearing activity in external fixation group was significantly earlier than that in steel plate group (P<0.05). The ROM and MEPS scores of elbow extension increased significantly in both groups with the time lapse after surgery, and there was no statistical significance in ROM and constant-Murley scores of shoulder lift between the two groups at corresponding time points after surgery (P<0.05). However, ROM and MEPS scores in external fixation group were significantly better than those in internal fixation group (P<0.05). Imaging showed no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between 2 groups (P>0.05). However, the fracture healing time of external fixation group was significantly earlier than that of internal fixation group (P<0.05) .[Conclusion]: Both external fixator and internal plate fixation are better methods for the treatment of throwing humeral fractures. External fixator has the advantages of less surgical trauma, less complications and early healing of fracture.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-27
  • 最后修改日期:2022-02-28
  • 录用日期:2022-06-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: