锁定钢板与空心螺钉固定对肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折患者骨折愈合及肩关节功能的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

黔南州中医医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effect of locking plate and hollow screw fixation on fracture healing and shoulder joint function in patients with dislocation of shoulder joint and fracture of greater tuberosity of humerus
Author:
Affiliation:

黔南州中医医院

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究肱骨近端锁定钢板(LPHP)与空心螺钉固定对肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折患者骨折愈合及肩关节功能的影响。方法 选取2016年1月—2019年3月本院收治的76例肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折患者为研究对象,根据手术方式分为采用LPHP固定治疗的钢板组(n=40)和采用空心螺钉固定治疗的螺钉组(n=36),记录两组围手术期出血量、手术时间、切口长度,并于术后定期随访记录患肢外展、外旋、前屈关节活动度(ROM),肩关节评分、优良率、骨折愈合时间及骨折复位质量。结果 螺钉组出血量、手术时间、切口长度低于钢板组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);末次随访与术前相比,两组肩关节外展、外旋、前屈ROM提高,且螺钉组高于钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。螺钉组肩关节评分、优良率高于钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);末次随访两组骨折均愈合,愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),螺钉组复位优秀率(61.11%)高于钢板组(52.50%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 两种方法对肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折均有较好疗效,空心螺钉固定治疗创伤小,可较好改善患者肩功能,且骨折愈合情况较好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effects of locking proximal humerus plate (LPHP) and hollow screw fixation on fracture healing and shoulder joint function in patients with shoulder dislocation and greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus. Methods A total of 76 patients with shoulder dislocation and greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to March 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the operation method, it was divided into a steel plate group (n=40) and a screw group (n=36) with a hollow screw fixation treatment. The perioperative blood loss, operation time, and incision length were recorded in the two groups, and the affected limb’s abduction, external rotation, and flexion range of motion (ROM), shoulder joint score, excellent and good rate, fracture healing time, and fracture healing time were recorded during regular follow-up after the operation. Fracture reduction quality. Results The blood loss, operation time, and incision length in the screw group were lower than those in the steel plate group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with preoperatively, the ROM of shoulder joint abduction, external rotation, and flexion increased in the two groups at the last follow-up, and the screw group was higher than the steel plate group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The score and excellent rate of shoulder joint in the screw group were higher than those in the plate group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the fractures of the two groups were healed, and there was no significant difference in healing time (P>0.05). The excellent reduction rate of the screw group (61.11%) was higher than that of the plate group (52.50%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-30
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-21
  • 录用日期:2022-01-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: