两种技术闭合筋膜切开减张创口的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.济宁医学院附属滕州市中心人民医院;2.滕州市中心人民医院;3.山东大学附属济南中心医院创伤中心;4.济宁医学院附属滕州市中心人民医院创伤外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

济宁医学院教师科研扶持基金课题(JYFC2019FKJ166)


Comparison of two techniques for closing fasciotomy and tension reduction wound
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Tengzhou Central People'2.'3.s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]比较使用NICE结技术联合VAC与钢丝、克氏针牵张闭合筋膜切开减张创口的临床效果。[方法]回顾性分析2017年3月至2021年3月骨筋膜室切开减压患者,共50例切口(45人)。联合组24例(22人)采用尼斯结联合VAC治疗,牵引组26例(23人)采用钢丝、克氏针治疗组,分析两组围手术期临床效果、费用及患者满意度。[结果]术后48小时内引流量及切口闭合时间联合组均高于牵引组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组VAS评分在术后1d、2d低于牵引组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组切口宽度在术后3d、6d高于牵引组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组HCT在术后1d、3d低于牵引组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。闭合创口费用联合组明显高于牵引组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组术后14天及术后3月的并发症均低于牵引组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者满意度无明显统计学意义(P >0.05)。[结论]尼斯结联合VAC比钢丝、克氏针技术疼痛程度低、并发症低,但失血量多、不具有成本及时间优势。 关键词:急性骨筋膜室综合征;筋膜切开术;伤口闭合;尼斯结;并发症

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the clinical outcomes of Nice knot technique combined with VAC versus steel wire and Kirschner pin for fasciotomy wounds. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 45 patients(50 Wounds)with fasciotomies from March 2017 to March 2021.The patients were divided into two groups,treated either by Nice knot technique combined with VAC (n=24 wounds, 22 patients, group N) or by steel wire and Kirschner pin (n=26 wounds, 23 patients, group S).The perioperative clinical effect, cost and patient satisfaction of the patients were data collected and statistically assessed.[Results] The postoperative drainage volume(48h)and the time of wound closure of group N were significantly higher than group S (P<0.05). VAS score(1,2d?after?operation)of group N were significantly lower than group S (P<0.05). Average wound width(3,6d?after?operation)of group N were significantly higher than group S (P<0.05). HCT(1,3d?after?operation)of group N were significantly lower than group S (P<0.05). Treatment costs of group N were significantly higher than group S (P<0.05). Complications(14 d and 3 M after operation)of group N were significantly lower than group S (P<0.05). The satisfaction of patients of 2 groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). [Conclusion] Nice knot technique combined with VAC is less painful and has lower complications than steel wire and Kirschner pin techniques, but has more blood loss and does not have cost and time advantages.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-26
  • 录用日期:2021-10-21
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: