峡部螺钉联合非融合椎弓钉固定治疗腰椎峡部裂
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

上海交通大学附属第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

上海市浦东新区医学学科建设项目(PWYts2018-03);上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会重点学科项目(PWZxk2017-18)


Buck techniqueIsthmic screw combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization systemnon-fused pedicle screw for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis
Author:
Affiliation:

The First People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨Buck技术结合Dynesys动态稳定系统治疗腰椎峡部裂探讨峡部螺钉结合非融合椎弓钉固定治疗腰椎峡部裂的可行性和临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年6月应用Buck技术结合Dynesys动态稳定系统治疗腰椎峡部裂应用峡部螺钉结合非融合椎弓钉固定治疗腰椎峡部裂或伴I度滑脱或盘源性腰痛的患者21例,男14例,女7例;年龄(35.6±12.9)岁(18~59岁)。其中单纯腰椎峡部裂8例,伴Ⅰ度滑脱8例,伴盘源性腰痛5例。术前及术后3个月、末次随访时采用VAS评分和和ODI评分评价临床疗效。术后12个月采用CT三维重建评价峡部融合情况;术前及末次随访时采用UCLA系统评价邻近节段椎间盘退变情况系统评价手术前后邻近节段椎间盘退变情况;观察随访时并发症情况。结果 21例患者均顺利完成手术,随访18~60个月,平均32.6个月。术后3个月及末次随访随着时间推移患者VAS评分和和ODI评分与术前比较均显著改善评分较术前明显减少(P<0.010.05)。术后1218个月峡部裂骨性融合率为95.2%(20/21),1例患者未融合,但症状较术前明显缓解。末次随访时根据100%。末次随访时UCLA系统评价为Ⅰ级12例,Ⅱ级6例,III级3例,与术系统评价与术前相同,未发现邻近节段退变加重情况。所有患者无严重并发症发生。结论 Buck技术结合Dynesys动态稳定系统治疗腰椎峡部裂峡部螺钉结合非融合椎弓钉固定治疗腰椎峡部裂或伴I度滑脱或盘源性腰痛是安全有效的,峡部融合率满意,特别适合于伴有I度滑脱或盘源性腰痛的患者。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of Buck technique combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods Data of 21 cases of lumbar spondylolysis who received Buck technique combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system from January 2015 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively were analyzed retrospectively. There were 14 males and 7 females, aged 35.6±12.9 years (18-59 years). Diagnosis included: lumbar spondylolysis alone in 8 cases, and spondylolysis with grade I spondylolisthesis in 8 cases, and spondylolysis with discogenic low back pain in 5 cases. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at preoperative, postoperative 3 months and final follow-up. Three-dimensional computed tomographic (3-D CT) reconstruction was used to evaluate bony fusion at 12 months postoperatively. UCLA system was used to evaluate the degeneration of adjacent segments at preoperative and final follow-up. The complications were observed during follow-up. Results The patients were followed up for averagely 32.6±9.4 months. The VAS score and ODI scores were significantly improved at postoperative 3 months and final follow-up compared with those before surgery (P<0.01). The healing rate of pars was 95.2% (20/21) at 12 months postoperatively. Nonunion was observed in 1 case, but low back pain was significantly relieved. According to the UCLA grading scale, 12 cases were evaluated as grade I and 6 cases as grade II and 3 cases as grade III at the final follow-up, which was the same as preoperative grade and indicated no deterioration of adjacent segment degeneration. No major complications occurred in all patients. Conclusion The combination of Buck technique and Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is safe and effective in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis with a high rate of isthmic fusion rate, especially in patients with grade I spondylolisthesis or discogenic low back pain.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-26
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-22
  • 录用日期:2021-12-10
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: