固定牵开复位器下微创经皮钢板固定Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型Pilon骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.青岛大学附属医院;2.青岛市第八人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Fixation of type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ Pilon fractures with minimally invasive percutaneous plate under fixed reductor
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University;2.Qingdao Eighth People&3.amp;4.#39;5.&6.s Hospital

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】:[目的] 探讨固定牵开复位器下微创经皮钢板固定Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型pilon 骨折的临床效果。[方法] 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2017年3月-2020年4月青岛大学附属医院创伤外科收治的48例Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型pilon骨折患者临床资料,将其按照手术方式的不同分为复位器组与常规组,比较两组围手术期资料、术后随访资料、及影像学测量结果的差异[结果] 两组患者手术均顺利完成。在围手术期资料中,复位器组手术时间、术中失血量、透视次数及切口长度少于或短于常规组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),而两组切口愈合等级及住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在随访资料中,常规组下地行走时间早于复位器组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),但后来完全负重活动时间比较中,两组趋于接近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在VAS评分、AOFAS评分、ROM评分指标,两组组内比较,末次随访时均较术前有显著改善,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),而两组组间比较时,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在影像测量结果中,两组骨折复位质量Burwell-Charnley分级及骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 对于II型、III型pilon骨折,采用固定牵开复位器微创经皮钢板固定与常规切开复位内固定技术治疗均能获得满意疗效,但固定牵开复位器微创经皮钢板固定具有手术时间和切口长度短、术中透视次数和出血量少的优点,值得临床推广。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 [Objective] To explore the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation under fixed retractor for type II and type III pilon fractures. [Method] A retrospective case-control study was used to analyze the clinical data of 48 patients with type II and type III pilon fractures admitted to the Department of Traumatology, Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from March 2017 to April 2020, and divide them into reduction according to different surgical methods. Compare the differences in perioperative data, postoperative follow-up data, and imaging measurement results between the two groups of resetter group and routine group. [Results] The operations of both groups were successfully completed. In the perioperative data, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy, and incision length in the reductor group were less than or shorter than those in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), while the two groups had incision healing grades and hospitalizations The time difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); in the follow-up data, the walking time in the routine group was earlier than that in the reductor group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), but later in the comparison of the time of complete weight-bearing activities, the two groups Tend to be close, the difference is not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the comparison of VAS score, AOFAS score, and ROM score between the two groups, there was a significant improvement in the last follow-up than before the operation, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), but when the two groups were compared, there was no statistical difference Scientific significance (P>0.05); In the imaging measurement results, there was no significant difference in the Burwell-Charnley classification of fracture reduction quality and fracture healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] For Type II and Type III pilon fractures, both minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation with fixed retractor and conventional open reduction and internal fixation techniques can achieve satisfactory results, but fixed retractor with minimally invasive percutaneous plate Fixation has the advantages of short operation time, incision length, fracture, intraoperative fluoroscopy and less bleeding, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-25
  • 录用日期:2021-12-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: