牛津单髁置换术中三种胫骨旋转截骨定位方法的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

驻马店市中心医院关节外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of three methods of tibial rotation osteotomy in Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

Joint Surgery, Zhumadian Central Hospital, Zhumadian, Henan 463000,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 目的 探讨牛津单髁置换术中,三种胫骨旋转截骨定位方法对胫骨假体位置参数和临床功能的影响。 方法 选择2018年1月至2020年6月符合纳入标准的膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者59例,其中男35例,女24例;左膝31例,右膝28例。按照数字法随机分为三组,其中观察组A采用髂前上棘定位,观察组B采用内侧髁间嵴尖与髌腱胫骨结节止点内缘连线定位(substitute anteroposterior line,sAP),观察组C采用胫骨解剖轴线定位。观察三组患者术中聚乙烯衬垫突出发生率、术后胫骨假体外旋角、内外翻角及后倾角及膝关节KSS评分。结果 (1)术中观察组A中5例(26.32%)聚乙烯衬垫向前内侧移动突,平均距离2.07±0.52mm。观察组B中为2例(10.00%),平均距离1.93±0.38mm(X2=6.553,P=0.037)。(2)观察组A外旋角度为7.84±2.49°,显著大于观察组B和观察组C的3.79±0.71°和 4.02±0.67°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察组B和观察组C之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)随访时间平均为9.82±2.05个月,随访期间无假体脱位、松动病例。观察组A中5例聚乙烯衬垫突出的患者3例出现疼痛。三组之间术前及术后1个月临床评分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月观察组B与观察组显著高于观察组A,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。 结论 牛津单髁置换术中sAP线和胫骨解剖轴线定位胫骨假体外旋,操作简单、可重复性高,有利于术后关节功能的恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the influence of three methods of tibial rotation osteotomy on the position parameters and clinical function of tibial prosthesis in Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty.Methods From January 2018 to June 2020, 59 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee were selected, including 35 males and 24 females, 31 cases ( left knee )and 28 cases(f right knee). According to the number method, they were randomly divided into three groups, observation group A used anterior superior iliac , observation group B used medial intercondylar crest tip and patellar tendon tibial tubercle insertion line(substitute anteroposterior line,sAP) , observation group C used tibial anatomical axis. The incidence of polyethylene liner protrusion, tibial external rotation angle, varus angle and posterior inclination angle, and KSS score of knee joint were observed.Results (1) in the observation group A, 5 cases (26.32%) of the polyethylene liner moved forward medial process, the average distance was 2.07 ± 0.52mm. In the observation group B, there were 2 cases (10.00%), the average distance was 1.93 ± 0.38mm (X2 = 6.553, P = 0.037). (2) The external rotation angle of observation group A was 7.84 ± 2.49 degrees, which was significantly higher than that of observation group B and C (3.79 ± 0.71 degrees and 4.02 ± 0.67 degrees, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between observation group B and C (P > 0.05). (3) The average follow-up time was 9.82 ± 2.05 months. There was no dislocation or loosening during the follow-up period. In observation group A, there were 5 patients with polyethylene liner protruding and 3 patients with pain. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores before and 1 month after operation among the three groups (P > 0.05). 6 months after operation, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001).Conclusions In Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty, the external rotation of tibial prosthesis is located by sAP line and tibial anatomical axis, which is easy to operate and has high repeatability, and is conducive to the recovery of joint function after operation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-28
  • 最后修改日期:2021-06-29
  • 录用日期:2021-07-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: