两种体位下股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定转子下骨折比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第960医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative study of two positions for proximal femur intramedullary nail anti-rotation system in treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

The 960 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]比较侧卧位与仰卧位下股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗转子下骨折的疗效。[方法]采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2015年1月至2019年6月解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院收治的67例股骨转子下骨折患者的临床资料,男44例,女23例;年龄平均(47.13±13.12)岁。骨折Seinsheimer分型:Ⅰ型15例,Ⅱ型17例,Ⅲ型19例,Ⅳ型9例,Ⅴ型7例。39例行侧卧位PFNA内固定治疗(侧卧位组),28例行仰卧位PFNA内固定治疗(仰卧位组)。比较两组围手术期、随访结果。[结果]两组均顺利完成手术,术中无神经、血管损伤等严重并发症,侧卧位组手术时间、术中出血量、切口总长度、透视次数、住院时间均优于仰卧位组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),患者均获平均[(15.91±1.74)个月随访。术后1个月髋关节功能Harris评分侧卧位组显著优于仰卧位阻(P﹤0.05)。两组骨折复位质量、临床愈合时间、术后6个月及12个月髋关节功能Harris评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。[结论]与传统的仰卧位手术相比,侧卧位具有无需牵引床、手术时间短、术中出血和透视次数少、髋关节早期功能恢复好等优点,是一种良好的转子下骨折手术体位。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]To compare the therapeutic effect of lateral position and supine position in proximal femur intramedullary nail anti-rotation system(PFNA) internal fixation for treating the femoral subtrochanteric fractures.[Methods]A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 67 patients with femoral subtrochanteric fractures admitted to the 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force from January 2015 to June 2019, including 44 males and 23 females, with mean age of (47.13±13.12) years. According to the Seinsheimer classification, there were 15 type Ⅰ, 17 type Ⅱ, 19 type Ⅲ, 9 type Ⅳ and 7 type Ⅴ cases. Of them, 39 patients were stabilized by PFNA internal fixation in lateral position(lateral group) and 28 patients in supine position(supine group). The perioperative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.[Results]All patients completed operation successfully without severe implications, such as neurological or vessel injuries. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, fluoroscopy frequency and in-hospital time of lateral group were all less than those of supine group, with significant differences (P<0.05). Patients were followed up for an average of (15.91±1.74)months. The Harris hip scores of lateral group at 1 month after surgery were significantly higher than those of supine group (P<0.05). There were no statistically differences in fracture reduction quality and healing time and Harris hip scores at 6 and 12 months after surgery between the two groups(P﹥0.05).[Conclusion]Compared with the traditional supine position, the lateral position in PFNA internal fixation needs no traction bed and can shorten the operative time, reduce the blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency and help early recovery of hip function. Therefore it is a better surgical position.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-18
  • 最后修改日期:2021-06-26
  • 录用日期:2021-07-05
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: