髋关节囊周围神经阻滞在直接前路全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

济宁医学院附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analgesic effect of peripheral nerve block of hip joint after direct anterior arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 目的 观察髋关节囊周围神经阻滞在直接前路全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果关节功能影响。方法 以2019年6月至2020年6月我院骨科收治的符合纳入标准的67例单侧DAA入路全髋关节置换患者为研究对象,依据随机数字法分为2组,其中髋关节囊周神经阻滞组(PENG组)34例(34髋),腰方肌阻滞组(QLB 组)33例(33髋)。观察两组患者的穿刺安全性、有效性,评估患者术后6h(T1)、12h(T2)、18h(T3)、24h(T4)疼痛VAS评分、PCIA按压次数,术后12h(T2)、24h(T4)时间点的髋关节最大屈曲及外展范围。结果 ①两组患者的性别、年龄、侧别、体重指数、ASA分级、术前诊断、手术时间等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。②PENG组神经穿刺时间长于QLB组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。但两组患者的首次穿刺成功率方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PENG组的闭孔神经、股神经的神经阻滞效果优于QLB 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③ T1-T3各时间点PENG组VAS评分均显著少于QLB组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。而T4时间点两组患者VAS评分和PCIA按压次数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④T2时间点,PENG组髋关节屈曲角度显著大于QLB组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),而T4时间点两组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。T2-T4时间点,两组患者髋关节最大外展角度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 髋关节囊周阻滞在直接前路全髋关节置换术后镇痛及关节功能康复方面优于股方肌阻滞。

    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective To observe the analgesic effect and joint function of pericapsular nerve block after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Methods: From June 2019 to June 2020, 67 patients with unilateral DAA in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, 34 cases (34 hips) in the pericapsular nerve block group (PENG group) and 33 cases (33 hips) in the quadratus lumborum block group (QLB group). The safety and effectiveness of puncture were observed in the two groups. VAS score, PCIA pressing times, maximum hip flexion and abduction range at 6h (T1), 12h (T2), 18h (T3) and 24h (T4) after operation were evaluated.Results ① There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, body mass index, ASA grade, preoperative diagnosis and operation time between the two groups (P > 0.05).② The nerve puncture time of PENG group was longer than that of QLB group (P < 0.001). But there was no significant difference in the first puncture success rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The nerve block effect of obturator nerve and femoral nerve in PENG group was better than that in QLB group (P < 0.05).③ The VAS score of PENG group was significantly lower than that of QLB group at T1-T3 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in VAS score and PCIA pressing times between the two groups at T4 (P > 0.05).④ At T2, the hip flexion angle of PENG group was significantly greater than that of QLB group (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at T4 (P > 0.05). At T2-T4, there was no significant difference in the maximum abduction angle between the two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions Peripheral nerve block of hip joint is superior to quadratus femoris block in analgesia and joint function rehabilitation after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14
  • 最后修改日期:2021-04-30
  • 录用日期:2021-06-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: