两种术式治疗中重度腕管综合征的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

滨州医学院烟台附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

山东省自然科学基金


Comparison of two surgical methods in the treatment of moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 比较小切口腕管切开松解术与传统腕管切开松解术治疗中重度腕管综合征的临床疗效。 [方法] 选取自2017年10月至2019年12月滨州医学院烟台附属医院手足外科收治的118例中重度腕管综合征患者,其中62例患者采用小切口腕管切开松解术(小切口组),56例患者采用传统腕管切开松解术(传统组)。比较两组手术时间、切口长度、术中失血量、住院时间、术前及术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、波士顿腕管综合征问卷(BCTQ)评分、瘢痕痛发生率。采用Kelly评分评估治疗效果。 [结果] 术后118例切口均甲级愈合。小切口组的手术时间、切口长度、术中失血量、住院时间要明显少于传统组(P<0.01)。术后1、3个月小切口组的VAS评分及BCTQ症状评分均低于传统组低(P<0.05),而术后6、12个月两组评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组术后BCTQ功能评价中小切口组术后3、6、12个月的评分低于传统组(P<0.05)。小切口组术后6、12月的瘢痕痛发生率均低于传统组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后6个月的优良率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后12个月小切口组优良率大于传统组(P<0.05)。 [结论] 小切口腕管切开松解术具有切口小、手术时间和住院时间短等特点,相比于传统腕管松解术可以有效改善患者术后早期的临床症状,且有利于患者术后中长期的功能恢复,降低瘢痕痛的发生率。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of mini-open carpal tunnel release and traditional carpal tunnel release in the treatment of moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome(CTS). [Methods] Using prospective cohort study, we selected 118 patients with moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome admitted to our department from October 2017 to December 2019, and 62 patients underwent mini-open carpal tunnel release (mini-open group),56 patients underwent traditional open carpal tunnel release(traditional group).The operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue (VAS) scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire(BCTQ) scores, the incidence of scar pain were compared between the two groups .Kelly's evaluation was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. [Results] All the 118 cases were healed at first grade. The operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time of the mini-open group were significantly shorter than those of the traditional group (P < 0.01). VAS score and BCTQ symptom score of the mini-open group were lower than those of the traditional group at 1 and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). The BCTQ functional status scale of the mini-open group were lower than those of the traditional group at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation (P < 0.05). The incidence of scar pain 6 months and 12 months after surgery in the mini-open group was lower than that in the traditional group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups at 6 months after surgery (P > 0.05), this rate of the mini-open group at 12 months after surgery was higher than that of the traditional group (P < 0.05). [Conclusion] Mini-open carpal tunnel release has the characteristics of small incision, short operation time and hospitalization time. Compared with traditional open carpal tunnel release, it can improve the early postoperative clinical symptoms of patients, and is conducive to the long-term functional recovery of patients after surgery and reduce the incidence of postoperative scar pain.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-22
  • 最后修改日期:2021-07-14
  • 录用日期:2021-07-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: