后外侧入路接骨板内固定治疗后Pilon骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南开大学附属人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Pilon fracture after treatment with posterolateral approach bone plate internal fixation
Author:
Affiliation:

1.People'2.'3.s Hospital of Nankai University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要目的:探究后外侧入路接骨板内固定治疗后Pilon骨折的临床效果。方法:选取自2017年2月至2019年5月收治的36例后Pilon骨折患者。根据不同的固定治疗方式将其分为观察组(采用后外侧入路接骨板内固定治疗,18例)以及对照组(采用由前向后空心钉固定治疗,18例),随访12-20个月,观察两组患者骨折康复情况、并发症以及临床疗效等。 结果:两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量以及住院时间均无明显差异(P>0.05),观察组骨折愈合时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者均得到随访,随访结果12~20个月,平均随访时间(16.72±3.68)个月。两组患者VAS评分以及ODI评分相比,术前无明显差异。而术后末次随访结果,两组患者的VAS、ODI评分均有所改善,并且观察组VAS、ODI评分明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者AOFAS评分明显优于对照组(P<0.05),观察组AOFAS优良率为94.44%,明显高于对照组得77.78%(P<0.05)。 观察组并发症发生率为5.55%,对照组并发症发生率为22.22%,对照组发生率高于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组复位优良率94.44%,对照组复位优良率77.78%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论:后外侧入路接骨板内固定治疗后Pilon骨折具有较好的临床疗效,内固定效果好,并发症发生率低,复位率高,值得临床推广。

    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective: To explore the clinical effect of Pilon fractures after the treatment of internal fixation with the posterolateral bone plate. Methods: A total of 36 patients with post-Pilon fractures admitted from February 2017 to May 2019 were selected. According to different fixation treatment methods, they were divided into observation group (18 cases treated with posterolateral bone plate internal fixation) and control group (18 cases treated with hollow screw fixation from front to back), and 12-20 follow-ups Month, observe the fracture rehabilitation, complications and clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients. Results: There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage, and hospitalization time between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture healing time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). All patients were followed up, the results were 12-20 months, and the average follow-up time was (16.72±3.68) months. Compared with the VAS score and ODI score of the two groups, there was no significant difference before the operation. The results of the last follow-up after operation showed that the VAS and ODI scores of the two groups of patients were improved, and the VAS and ODI scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). The AOFAS score of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the excellent and good rate of AOFAS in the observation group was 94.44%, which was significantly higher than the control group's 77.78% (P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.55%, the incidence of complications in the control group was 22.22%, and the incidence in the control group was higher than that in the observation group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of reduction in the observation group was 94.44%, and that in the control group was 77.78%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The posterolateral approach bone plate internal fixation has a good clinical effect on Pilon fractures. The internal fixation effect is good, the complication rate is low, and the reduction rate is high. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:2021-04-30
  • 录用日期:2021-05-31
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: