两种椎体间融合术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

广西医科大学附属民族医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

广西卫生和计划委员会自筹经费科研课题 Z20170289,广西自然科学基金项目 2018GXNSFBA281119


Comparison of the efficacy of MIS-TLIF and open PLIF in the treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis under Quadrant channel
Author:
Affiliation:

Minzu Hospital, Guangxi Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的]比较 Quadrant通道下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术(minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MIS-TLIF)与开放性后路腰椎椎体间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF)治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。[方法]本院2016年1月-2019年1 月收治的双节段腰椎管狭窄症患者60例纳入本研究,其中24例列入MIS-TLIF组,采用 Quadrant通道下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗;36例列入PLIF组,采用开放性后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、并发症情况、椎间融合等级以及术前、术后患者疼痛 VAS评分、生活质量SF-36评分、功能障碍ODI 指数、椎间隙高度、椎管面积、LL(L1~S1 Cobb角)。[结果]MIS-TLIF组的手术时间较PLIF组长,但术中出血量及住院时间均优于PLIF组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者手术治疗后疼痛程度均下降,但MIS-TLIF组术6个月的腰部疼痛VAS 评分均显著低于PLIF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1年随访,两组间腰腿部疼痛 VAS评分、生活质量SF-36评分、功能障碍ODI 指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像学方面,两组术后椎间隙高度、椎管面积及LL(L1~S1 Cobb角)较术前明显改善, MIS-TLIF组术后12个月椎管面积大于PLIF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]在双节段腰椎管狭窄症的治疗中,与传统PLIF术相比,在Quadrant通道下MIS-TLIF手术的术中出血量减少,减压更彻底,术后住院时间显著缩短,同时患者身体在恢复期间的疼痛程度得到显著缓解。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective]To compare the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)under Quadrant channel and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)in the treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis.[Methods]A total of 60 patients with two-level lumbar spinal stenosis admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2019 were included in this study. Among them, 24 patients were included in the MIS-TLIF group and treated with minimally invasive surgery-TLIF under the Quadrant channel. 36 patients were included in the PLIF group and treated with open PLIF. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, interbody fusion grade, pain VAS score, quality of life SF-36 score and dysfunction ODI index were compared between the two groups.[Results]Compared with the PLIF group, the MIS-TLIF group had longer operation time, but less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The degree of pain in both groups decreased after surgical treatment, but the VAS score of lumbar pain 6 months after surgery in the MIS-TLIF group was significantly lower than that in the PLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 1 year follow-up, there were no significant differences in VAS score, SF-36 score and ODI between the two groups(P<0.05). 12 months after surgery, regarding to radiographic measures,the intervertebral space height, the canal area and LL(L1~S1 Cobb)significantly increased postoperatively by comparison with those before operation, the spinal canal area in the MIS-TLIF group was larger than that in the PLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). [Conclusion]In the clinical treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis, compared with the traditional open PLIF, MIS-TLIF under quadrant channel can reduce the amount of blood loss, reduce stress more thoroughly, shorten the hospitalization time, and relieve the pain of patients during the recovery period.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-25
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-09
  • 录用日期:2021-06-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: