经皮与开放减压固定AO-A3胸腰骨折伴神经损伤的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

上海浦东新区人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

1.上海市浦东新区卫生系统优秀青年医学人才培养计划(PWRq2020-18);2.上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点亚专科建设项目(PWZy2020-04)


A comparative study of minimally invasive and open decompression and internal fixation in the treatment of AO-A3 thoracolumbar spinal fractures with nerve injury
Author:
Affiliation:

1.pudong new district peoples'2.'3.hospital of shanghai

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 对比经皮椎弓根钉内固定(PPSF)联合Quadrant通道下椎管减压、复位和开放椎弓根钉内固定(OPSF)联合椎板切除减压治疗合并神经损伤的AO分型A3型胸腰段脊柱骨折(TLF)的影像学和临床指标。[方法] 回顾性分析2018年01月?2020年01月在本院接受手术治疗的单节段AO分型A3型胸腰段脊柱骨折患者63 例。26 例采用PPSF联合后正中入路Quadrant通道下椎管减压复位术(PPSF组);37例采用椎弓根钉内固定联合椎板切除减压术(OPSF组)。对比两组影像学和临床指标。[结果] PPSF组术中失血量以及术后住院时间指标优于OPSF组,但手术时间多于OPSF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PPSF组术后肌酸激酶指标在术后1周显著低于OPSF组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PPSF组VAS、ODI 评分显著优于OPSF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者椎体前缘高度比术后随访过程中差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但PPSF组椎体后缘高度比和伤椎局部后凸Cobb角指标优于OPSF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论] PPSF联合后正中入路Quadrant通道下椎管减压复位治疗合并神经损伤的AO分型-A3型TLF患者手术创伤小、术后恢复快、影像学指标恢复好,具有一定的微创性、安全性和有效性。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the imaging and clinical results of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) combined with spinal canal decompression and reduction under Quadrant tube versus open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) combined with laminectomy and decompression in the treatment of AO type A3 thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) with nerve injury. [Methods] From January 2018 to January 2020, 63 patients with single level AO type A3 TLF were retrospectively analyzed. 26 patients were treated with PPSF combined with decompression and reduction under Quadrant tube via posterior midline approach (the PPSF group); 37 patients were treated with OPSF combined with laminectomy and decompression (the OPSF group). The radiological data and clinical outcome were compared. [Results] The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in group PPSF were significantly better than those in group OPSF (P < 0.05), but the operation time was significantly longer than that in group OPSF (P < 0.05). The CK index of group PPSF was significantly lower than that of group OPSF at 1 week after operation (P < 0.05). During the follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of group PPSF were significantly better than those of group OPSF, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the AVHR index of the two groups during the postoperative follow-up (P > 0.05), but the PVHR and Cobb angle indexes of local kyphosis of group PPSF were better than those of group OPSF, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). [Conclusions] PPSF combined with decompression and reduction of spinal canal under Quadrant tube via posterior midline approach exerts minimal trauma, fast postoperative recovery and satisfactory imaging indexes, which is minimally invasive, safe and effective.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2021-06-12
  • 录用日期:2021-07-05
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: