关节置换与内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.昆明医科大学附属延安医院(昆明市延安医院);2.云南省砚山县人民医院骨科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Orthopedics, Yan'2.'3.an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University (Yan'4.an Hospital of Kunming City);5.Department of Orthopedics, Yanshan County People&6.amp;7.#39;8.&9.s Hospital, Wenshan,Yunnan

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的]比较关节置换与内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析自2017年7月-2018年12月行手术治疗的120例高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者,置换组60例行人工髋关节置换,固定组60例行PFNA内固定治疗。比较两组术前、围手术期、随访及影像学资料。[结果]固定组在手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后引流量均优于置换组,而置换组在术中透视次数、住院时间方面显著优于固定组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者均接受了12-36个月的随访,平均(20.01±6.76)个月。置换组术后下地行走时间及完全负重活动时间均明显早于固定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者VAS评分随时间推移而显著减少,而髋关节功能Harris评分显著增加,不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1月,固定组VAS评分小于置换组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6月及末次随访时,两组间VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3月和6月时,置换组患者髋关节功能Harris评分均显著高于固定组,两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后12个月时,两组间髋关节功能Harris评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。[结论]关节置换及PFNA内固定两种方法治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折均可以取得满意的临床效果。临床选择治疗方式时应严格把握适应证,个性化的治疗方案是获得满意治疗效果的关键。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective] To compare the clinical effects of Artificial hip arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly.[Methods]A retrospective analysis of 120 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures who received surgical treatment from July 2017 to December 2018, 60 patients in the arthroplasty group received hip arthroplasty, and 60 patients in the fixed group received PFNA internal fixation treatment. The preoperative ,perioperative, follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results] The fixed group was superior to the arthroplasty group in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and postoperative drainage volume, while the arthroplasty group was significantly superior to the fixed group in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy and hospitalization time,All the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Both groups of patients were followed up for 12 to 36 months, with an average of (20.01±6.76) months. The post-operative walking time and full weight-bearing activity time of arthroplasty group were significantly earlier than those in the fixed group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).The VAS scores in both groups decreased significantly over time,and the Harris score of hip joint function was significantly increased,with statistical significance at different time points (P<0.05). One month after surgery, the VAS score of the fixed group was lower than that of the arthroplasty group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at 6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Harris scores of hip joint function in the arthroplasty group were significantly higher than those in the fixation group, with statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).At 12 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the Harris score of hip joint function between the two groups (P>0.05).[Conclusion] Both arthroplasty and PFNA internal fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.Strictly grasp the indications when choosing a treatment method in clinic, and a personalized treatment plan is the key to obtain a satisfactory treatment effect in the clinic.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-08
  • 最后修改日期:2021-02-08
  • 录用日期:2021-03-08
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: