闭合与有限切开复位InterTAN治疗Seinsheimer V型转子下骨折的疗效比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

荆门市第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of curative effect between closed and limited open reduction and lengthened InterTAN in the treatment of Seinsheimer V subtrochanteric fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

The First People,s Hospital of Jingmen

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要 [目的] 对比闭合复位与有限切开复位加长InterTAN髓内钉治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨转子下骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析从2017年1月-2020年5月收治和采用加长InterTAN髓内钉内固定治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨转子下骨折病例资料,共42例(43髋),其中采用闭合复位即闭合复位组15例(15髋),采用有限切开复位钛缆联合加长InterTAN髓内钉内固定治疗即有限切开组27例(28髋)。[结果] 两组患者均顺利手术,无血管神经损伤等严重并发症。有限切开组手术时间、术中出血量显著多于闭合复位组,差异均有统计学意(P<0.05)。42例患者随访6~42个月,平均16.4个月。影像检查显示,所有患者骨折复位良好。闭合复位组骨折愈合时间显著多于有限切开组,差异有统计学意(P<0.05);比较两组末次随访时髋关节Harris功能评分、VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。闭合复位组术后1例出现因提前负重内固定切除,予以行人工关节置换翻修手术治疗,两组并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 闭合复位与有限切开复位加长InterTAN髓内钉治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨转子下骨折均能获得较好效果,采用有限切开复位骨折复位好、固定可靠、愈合快、并发症少,为闭合复位困难时的不错选择。

    Abstract:

    Abstract [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of closed reduction and limited open reduction with lengthened InterTAN intramedullary nail in the treatment of Seinsheimer V subtrochanteric fractures. [Methods] A retrospective analysis was performed from January 2017 to May 2020 and the case data of Seinsheimer V-type femoral subtrochanteric fractures treated with lengthened InterTAN intramedullary nail internal fixation. A total of 42 cases (43 hips) were used, including closed reduction. There were 15 cases (15 hips) in the closed reduction group, and 27 cases (28 hips) in the limited open reduction group were treated with limited open reduction titanium cables combined with extended InterTAN intramedullary nail fixation. [Results] Both groups of patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as vascular and nerve damage. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the limited incision group were significantly more than those in the closed reduction group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 42 patients were followed up for 6 to 42 months, with an average of 16.4 months. The imaging examination showed that all patients had good fracture reduction. The fracture healing time of the closed reduction group was significantly longer than that of the limited incision group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the Harris function score and VAS score of the hip joint at the last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05) . In the closed reduction group, 1 case had resection due to premature weight-bearing internal fixation and was treated with artificial joint replacement surgery. There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] Both closed reduction and limited open reduction and lengthened InterTAN intramedullary nails can achieve better results in the treatment of Seinsheimer V-type femoral subtrochanteric fractures. Limited open reduction has good fracture reduction, reliable fixation, fast healing, and fewer complications. Good choice when closing reset is difficult.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-15
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-15
  • 录用日期:2021-01-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: