不同入路下椎间孔镜下腰椎髓核摘除术治疗巨大型腰椎间盘突出症
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

民航总医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Treatment of giant lumbar disc herniation by lumbar nucleus pulpectomy under foraminoscopy through different approaches
Author:
Affiliation:

Civil Aviation General Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 分析巨大腰椎间盘突出症患者中采用椎板间入路(PEID)或椎间孔入路(PETD)下腰椎髓核摘除术治疗的安全性与有效性。[方法] 回顾性分析2016年9月~2019年9月我院骨科接受椎间孔镜下腰椎髓核摘除术治疗的巨大腰椎间盘突出症患者159例,PEID组接受椎板间入路方式(84例),PETD组接受椎间孔入路方式(75例)。[结果] 两组患者的围手术期指标等均差异较小(P>0.05);末次随访时,两组患者的随访指标均明显改善(P <0.05),而两组间比较差异较小(P>0.05)。[结论]在巨大型腰椎间盘突出症患者中应用椎间孔入路和椎板间入路下腰椎髓核摘除术均可获取较好的临床疗效,临床应在评估手术适应证后灵活选择入路方式,旨在获取最优效果。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To analyze the safety and effectiveness of lumbar nucleus pulposus enucleation by intervertebral laminar approach (PEID) or foraminal approach (PETD) in patients with giant lumbar disc herniation.[Methods] A retrospective analysis was conducted on 159 patients with giant lumbar disc herniation who underwent endoscopic lumbar nucleus pulpectomy from September 2016 to September 2019 in the orthopedics department of our hospital, including 84 patients in the PEID group and 75 patients in the PETD group.[Result] The perioperative indexes of the two groups were slightly different (P > 0.05); at the last follow-up, the follow-up indexes of the two groups were significantly improved (P < 0.05), while the difference between the two groups was smaller (P > 0.05).[Conclusion] Both foraminal approach and interlaminar approach for lumbar nucleus pulposus enucleation can achieve better clinical efficacy in patients with giant lumbar disc herniation. The approach should be flexibly selected after evaluating the indications of surgery in order to obtain the best results.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-02
  • 最后修改日期:2021-03-16
  • 录用日期:2021-04-23
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: