改良腓骨沟加深支持带重建治疗腓骨肌腱滑脱症
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

滨州医学院附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Modified peroneal sulcus deepening combined with reconstruction of superior peroneal retinaculum for the treatment of peroneal tendon dislocation
Author:
Affiliation:

Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [摘要] 目的 探讨改良腓骨沟加深支持带重建治疗腓骨肌腱滑脱症的手术疗效。方法 2013年7月~2019年6月行手术治疗的51例腓骨肌腱滑脱症,43例纳入研究,其中行改良腓骨沟加深支持带重建治疗的22例,为改良组;行腓骨沟加深支持带重建手术治疗21例,为对照组;比较两组手术时间、术中失血量、住院时间、围手术期并发症、VAS评分、AOFAS评分、踝背伸-跖屈活动度(ROM)。结果 两组手术时间、术中失血量、住院时间、围手术期并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。改良组术后3个月的ROM显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组末次随访的ROM差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。改良组术后3个月的VAS评分、AOFAS评分均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。改良组末次随访的VAS评分、AOFAS评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与腓骨沟加深支持带重建术相比,改良腓骨沟加深支持带重建术不增加手术时间、出血量、住院天数及围手术期并发症,且效果更佳,快速康复,值得推广。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective To introduce a combined operation for treating peroneal tendon dislocation and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients. Methods From July 2013 to June 2019, 51 cases of peroneal tendon dislocationwere treated in our hospital. 43 cases were included in the study. Among them, 22 cases underwent modified fibular groove deepening combined with reconstruction of SPR,which served as the improved group; 21 patients underwent fibular groove deepening combined with reconstruction of SPR ,which served as the control group. Compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, perioperative complications, VAS score, AOFAS score, ankle dorsi extension-plantar flexion range of motion (ROM ). Results There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay,and perioperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The ROM of the modified group at 3 months after operation was significantly better than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01); the ROM of the modified group at 6 months after surgery and the last follow-up were better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The VAS score and AOFAS score of the modified group 3 months after operation were significantly better than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The VAS score and AOFAS score of the modified group at the last follow-up were better than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the fibular groove deepening,the modified fibular groove deepening does not increase the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay,perioperative complications, and has better effects, rapid recovery, which is worthy of promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-12
  • 最后修改日期:2020-11-24
  • 录用日期:2020-11-30
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: