经皮内镜下经椎间孔入路双侧减压融合术对重度腰椎中央管狭窄症患者近期疗效及多裂肌的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

甘肃省庆阳市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Short-term efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral lumbar interbody fusion for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis and its effect on multifidus muscle
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Qingyang City people'2.'3.s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 探讨经皮内镜下经椎间孔入路双侧减压融合术(PE-TLIF)对重度腰椎中央管狭窄症(LSS)患者的治疗效果及对多裂肌的影响。方法 回顾性分析82例接受PE-TLIF治疗的82例重度中央LSS患者的临床资料,38例单侧入路双侧减压为U组,44例双侧入路双侧减压为B组。比较两组手术情况,手术前后测定血清肌酸激酶(CK)水平,测评腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),测量硬囊膜横截面积(DCSA)、多裂肌总横截面积(MCSA)。结果 术后1d、3d、7d,U组的血清CK水平低于B组(P<0.05)。术后3个月及末次随访,U组的腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI均显著低于B组(P<0.05)。末次随访时,U组的MCSA高于B组(P<0.05),但组间DCSA差异不显著(P>0.05)。U组FBSS发生率低于B组,MacNab优良率显著高于B组(P<0.05)。结论 单侧或双侧入路双侧减压PE-TLIF治疗重度中央LSS均安全有效,但单侧入路双侧减压对多裂肌的损伤更小,术后疼痛改善更理想。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To investigate the short-term efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TIL) for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and its effect on multifidus muscle. Methods The clinical data of 82 patients with severe central LSS were retrospectively analyzed. 38 patients with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach as group U, 44 patients with bilateral decompression via bilateral approaches as group B.The operation conditions of the two groups were compared, the serum creatine kinase (CK) level was measured, the visual analog scale (VAS) score of low back and leg pain, the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), the dural sac cross-sectional area(DCSA), multifidus cross-sectional area (MCSA) were detected before and after surgery. Results The serum CK level in group U was lower than that in group B at 1d, 3d and 7d after surgery (P<0.05). At 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up, the VAS score and ODI in group U were significantly lower than the group B (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the MCSA of group U was higher than the group B (P<0.05), but the difference in DCSA between the groups was not significant (P>0.05). The incidence of FBSS in group U was lower than that in group B, and the excellent and good rate of MacNab was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion The bilateral decompression via unilateral or bilateral approach in PE-TLIF are safe and effective for the treatment of severe central LSS, while the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach has less damage to the multifidus muscle and can get more ideal postoperative pain symptom improvement.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-04
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-04
  • 录用日期:2020-09-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: