髌上入路与髌下入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的临床结果比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

福建医科大学附属第二医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of clinical outcomes between suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach with intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures.
Author:
Affiliation:

福建医科大学附属第二医院

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较髌上入路与髌下入路两种入路的胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的疗效及并发症。 方法:回顾分析2017~2018年我院收治的胫骨骨折行髓内钉治疗的63例患者的资料,比较髌上入路与髌下入路胫骨髓内钉的手术时间、出血量、骨折愈合情况、畸形愈合的发生率、感染发生率、术后膝关节疼痛评分、Lysholm knee膝关节功能评分。 结果:63例患者中行髌上入路30例,髌下入路33例,平均随访14.4个月,髌上入路组的平均手术时间(85.6±25.6min)明显短于髌下入路组(115.6±42.8min),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002),术后1年膝关节疼痛NRS评分髌上入路组(平均2.3分)低于髌下入路组(平均3.2分),差异有统计学意义(P=0.020),术后1年Lysholm膝关节功能评分髌上入路组(平均85.76分)明显高于髌下入路组(平均74.99分),差异有统计学意义(P=0.021)。在术中出血量、感染发生率、骨折愈合率以及骨折畸形愈合率上两组之间的差别无统计学意义(P>0.05) 结论:髌上入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折可以减少手术时间,减少术后膝前痛,改善术后膝关节功能,该手术方式具有手术微创、操作相对简单、透视方便、疗效确切、术后并发症少等优点,是治疗胫骨骨折的一种良好选择。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To compare the efficacy and complications of tibial intramedullary nail in the treatment of tibial fracture by suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach. Methods: The data of 63 patients with tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nail in our ospital from 2017 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, amount of bleeding,hospital from 2017 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, amount of bleeding, fracture healing, incidence of malunion, incidence of infection, postoperative knee pain score and Lysholm knee function score were compared between suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach. Results: Of all 63 patients,there were 30 cases of suprapatellar approach, 33 cases of infrapatellar approach.An average follow-up of 14.4 months. The mean operative time of supratellar approach group (85.6±25.6min) was significantly shorter than that of infrapatellar approach group (115.6±42.8min), the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.002). 1 year after surgery, the NRS score of knee pain in the suprapatellar approach group (mean 2.3 points) was lower than that of the infrapatellar approach group (mean 3.2 points), difference was statistically significant (P = 0.020).1 year after surgery, Lysholm knee function score of suprapatellar approach group (mean 85.76 points) was significantly higher than that of infrapatellar approach group (mean 74.99 points), and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.021). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, infection rate, fracture healing rate or fracture malunion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Suprapatellar approach intramedullary nail treatment for tibial fracture can reduce the operation time, reduce postoperative anterior knee pain, and improve postoperative knee joint function. This surgical approach has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, relatively simple operation, convenient fluoroscopy, exact curative effect, and fewer postoperative complications, and is a good choice for the treatment of tibial fracture.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-03
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-03
  • 录用日期:2020-09-30
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: