内镜椎间盘切除术与激素治疗L5/S1椎间盘脱出症
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Combination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Glucocorticoid for L5/S1 Prolapsed Lumbar Disc Herniation
Author:
Affiliation:

The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究经皮脊柱内镜下椎间盘切除术联合激素(glucocorticoid,GC)治疗L5/S1椎间盘脱出症的疗效。方法 选取我院2015年6月~2019年1月收治的116例单纯L5/S1椎间盘脱出症患者作为研究对象,行内镜下椎间盘切除术,根据是否应用GC和GC用法分为硬膜外组、静脉组和安慰剂组。观察术前、术后1天、7天、3月和末次随访时三组疼痛数字评价量表(numerical rating scale, NRS)和日本骨科协会脊柱评分(Japanese Orthopedic Association, JOA)得分,末次随访时根据改良MacNab疗效评定标准评价总体优良率。结果 术前三组NRS评分和JOA评分之间无统计学差异,术后1天NRS评分硬膜外组最低,静脉组其次,安慰剂组最高;JOA评分硬膜外组最高,静脉组其次,安慰剂组最低。术后7天硬膜外组NRS评分显著高于另外两组,JOA评分显著低于另外两组。术后3月和末次随访时三组NRS、JOA评分之间无统计学差异。末次随访时优良率分别为96.0%、92.8%和97.0%,三组之间无统计学差异。结论 采用经皮脊柱内镜治疗L5/S1椎间盘脱出症可取得良好的效果,术后硬膜外局部注射GC可短期内进一步提升疗效

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of glucocorticoid (GC) administration after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for L5/S1 prolapsed lumbar disc herniation (PLDH). Methods Restropective ananlysis was made of the 116 patients diagnosed with single L5/S1 PLDH and underwent PELD in our hospital from June 2015 to January 2019. Patients accepted epidural GC injection were allocated into epidural group, intravenous GC injection into intravenous group, and intravenous placebo injection into placebo group . Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores at preoperation and postoperative 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months and final follow-up were documented to assess clinical efficacy. The excellent and good rate was evaluated according to modified MacNab criterion at final follow-up. Results At preoperation,the NRS and JOA scores were not significantly different among three groups. At postoperative 1 day, the NRS score in placebo group was highest, followed by intravenous and epidural groups, while the JOA score in epidural group was highest, followed by intravenous and placebo groups. At postoperative 7 days, the NRS and JOA scores in epidural group was lower and higher, respectively, than those in intravenous and placebo groups. At postoperative 3 and final follow-up, the NRS and JOA scores were not statistically significant different among three groups. The excellent and good rates were 96.0%, 92.8% and 97.0% in three groups at final follow-up, respectively, and no significant difference among three groups was observed. Conclusions Good clinical efficacy could be achieved in L5/S1 PLDH patients treating with PELD, which could be further improved and kept for a longer time by epidural GC injection after PELD

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-06
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-10
  • 录用日期:2021-09-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: