两种复合内固定治疗股骨远端骨不连的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

山西医科大学第二医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

山西省自然科学基金面上项目(201901D111370)


Comparison of two combined internal fixations for the treatment of distal femoral nonunion
Author:
Affiliation:

Second hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Fund Project:

Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi (201901D111370)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的]探讨内外侧双钢板(DLP)与逆行髓内钉结合钢板(RNP)治疗股骨远端骨折术后骨不连的疗效。[方法]回顾性研究2015年1月~2018年9月于本院治疗股骨远端骨不连患者29例。其中,15例采用DLP组治疗,14例采用RNP治疗。分析比较两组围手术期、随访与影像等资料。[结果]两组患者手术均顺利完成。术中均无血管、神经损伤等严重并发症发生。RNP组在总住院时间、术后引流量、切口总长度及术中透视次数上方面具有明显优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组间在手术时间及术中出血量上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访13~31个月,平均(18.31±5.01)个月。随术后时间推移,两组患者疼痛逐步减轻,双下肢功能逐步改善。末次随访较术前相比,两组患者膝关节HSS评分显著增加,下肢短缩畸形及内外翻畸形显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组患者膝关节伸-屈ROM改善不明显(P>0.05)。术后两组间患者在下地行走时间、完全负重活动时间及骨折愈合时间上RNP组均明显优于DLP组,而在膝关节伸-屈ROM方面DLP组显著优于RNP组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间膝关节HSS评分、下肢短缩畸形及内外翻畸形矫正方面,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像评估方面,两组均达到骨性愈合,其中,RNP组骨折愈合时间为(6.14±1.51)个月,而DLP组为(7.40±1.68)个月,两组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。末次随访两组患者术后均无内固定松动、弯曲及断裂或退钉、拉力螺钉切割等并发症,未发生再次损伤。[结论]两种治疗方式对于治疗股骨远端骨不连均可取得满意的矫正和临床治疗效果,RNP组在围手术期、下地行走时间、骨愈合时间及完全负重时间方面更具优势,但在膝关节活动度上DLP可能更具优势。

    Abstract:

    Abstact:[Objective]To compare the curative effect of internal and lateral double plate (DLP) with retrograde intramedullary nail combined with plate (RNP) during the treatment of nonunion of the distal femur. [Methods]In the retrospective study, 29 patients who received treatment for nonunion of distal femoral at the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2015 to September 2018 were collected and divided into DLP group and RNP group according to different treatment methods. Among them, 15 patients were treated with DLP and 14 patients were treated with RNP. The therapeutic effects of various surgical treatment methods are analyzed and compared. [Results] All operations were successful and and there's no serious vascular complications and nerves injuries during the surgery. The DLP group shows obvious superiorities in terms of hospitalization time, postoperative drainage volum, incision length and frequency of X-rays, with significant difference(P<0.05)But there is no statistical singnificance for operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05).29 patients were followed up for 10 to 31 months (average 18.31±5.01 months) postoperatively Both groups's pains were reduced and the function of their lower limbs had been improved postoperatively. Compared with preoperative values, HSS knee function scores of the two groups increased significantly and shortening and varus deformity of involved limb improved obviously at the last time of follow-up,with a significant difference(P<0.05) . But the improvement of knee motion function (ROM) is not obvious(P>0.05). After the surgery, the RNP group is distinctly better than the DLP group in terms of duration of walking, full weight bearing activities and fracture healing. But in the aspect of stretch or flexion of knee jont ROM, the DLP group is obviously better the the RNP group,with a significant difference(P<0.05). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of shortening deformity, varus deformity and HSS knee function scores (P>0.05).All cases achieved bone healing after radiographic evaluations. The average bone healing time of the DLP group and RNP group was(7.40±1.68) M and (6.14±1.51) M respectively, with a significant difference (P <0.05). There's no complications such as loosening, bending and breaking of internal fixation, or Screw exit or incision of lag screw [Conclusion]Both treatment methods can achieve good curative effect for the treatment of nonunion of distal femur, and there is little difference of treatment effect between the two groups. The RNP group may have more advantages in perioperative period, duration of walking, bone healing time and full weight bearing time , while DLP may have more advantages in knee mobility.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-14
  • 录用日期:2020-10-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: