GustiloⅢ型严重下肢毁损伤保肢治疗的临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.潍坊医学院;2.中国人民解放军陆军第80集团军医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Limb-Salvage Treatment Clinical Studies Of GustiloⅢ Severe Lower Limb Destructive Injury
Author:
Affiliation:

1.weifang medical university;2.The 80th Group Military Hospital of the PLA

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:通过对GustiloⅢ型的严重下肢毁损伤进行保肢手术并成功的病例进行回顾性分析和总结,探讨GustiloⅢ型严重下肢损伤的保肢方法的选择。 方法:从2014年1月至2018年1月我院收治的GustiloⅢ型严重下肢毁损伤行保肢手术的患者中,筛选出30例符合本研究纳入标准的病例。筛选条件包括:患者术中及围手术期的病例特点、皮瓣的存活、手术并发症及整体的长期预后。所有纳入本研究患者伤后在4~8小时内进行急诊手术。其中外固定架固定21例,钢板内固定9例。胫腓骨开放骨折22例,股骨干开放骨折4例,股骨髁间开放骨折伴脱位4例。病例均一期行血管修复。一期直接缝合创面病例12例,18例创面无法直接缝合的患者进行VSD负压吸引敷料覆盖创面。这18例进行二期创面修复,直接缝合5例,游离植皮5例,皮瓣覆盖8例。二期外固定支架更换为内固定钢板26例。回顾性分析临床保肢的术前判断、保肢的方法选择。 结果:本组30例GustiloⅢ型下肢毁损伤行保肢治疗并成功的病例,术后所有病例均获得随访,随访时间6个月至24个月。24例患者肢体外形良好,5例瘢痕增生及皮瓣臃肿行二期皮瓣修整术,其中4例患者表示无影响。1例患者术后出现创面感染,二次手术彻底清创骨水泥植入联合应用抗生素,12个月后愈合。其中29例患者患肢活动功能恢复良好,术后采用VAS评分法:0-3分:27例;4-6分:3例;7-10分:0例。 结论:针对GustiloⅢ型下肢毁损伤的治疗,彻底清创是术后愈合的前提,及时高效的显微外科技术吻合血管是保肢成功的关键,合理的固定方式选择,一期或二期创面闭合,可以最大限度使保肢手术获得成功。

    Abstract:

    Objective Through the Gustilo Ⅲ severely destructive injury of lower limbs were limb-salvage surgery and successful cases were retrospectively analyzed and summarized, to explore Gustilo Ⅲ severe lower extremity injury limb-salvage method, the timing of the limb function reconstruction and the method and curative effect after limb salvage function. Methods In four years, 30 cases in our hospital this study included in standard Gustilo Ⅲ patients with severe lower limb destructive injury, limb salvage surgery.The screening data included intraoperative and perioperative case characteristics, flap survival, surgical complications and overall long-term prognosis.All patients included in this study underwent emergency surgery within 4 to 8 hours after injury.There were 21 cases of external fixator fixation and 9 cases of internal steel plate fixation.There were 22 cases of tibiofibular fracture, 4 cases of femoral shaft fracture, and 4 cases of femoral intercondylar open fracture with dislocation.All the selected patients underwent vascular repair at the first stage. Among them, 12 cases of directly closed wounds and 18 cases of patients who could not be directly sutured received VSD negative pressure suction dressing to cover the wounds.The18 cases underwent second-stage wound repair, 5 cases were directly sutured, 5 cases were free skin grafts, and 8 cases were covered with flaps.The external fixator was replaced with the internal fixator in 26 cases.A retrospective analysis was made on the preoperative judgment, method selection and functional efficacy of clinical limb salvage. Results This group of 30 cases of Gustilo Ⅲ destructive injury of lower limbs limb salvage treatment and successful cases, all cases received follow-up after surgery, 6 months to 24 months follow-up time.The limbs of 24 patients were in good shape, 5 patients underwent second-stage flap repair for hypertrophic scar and swollen skin flap, and 4 patients showed no effect.1 patient developed wound surface infection after surgery, and the bone cement was implanted with antibiotics after the second operation, and healed after 12 months.Among them, 29 patients had good recovery of limb mobility, and the patients were very satisfied with the curative effect of limb salvage surgery.Postoperative VAS score was used: 0-3:27 cases.4-6 points: 3 cases;7-10 points: 0 cases. Conclusion The destructive injury of lower limbs for Gustilo Ⅲ treatment, thorough debridement is the precondition of postoperative healing, microsurgical technique anastomosis is the key to successful limb salvage, choose reasonable fixed way, 1st or 2nd stage wound closure, success can make utmost limb-salvage surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-11
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-09
  • 录用日期:2020-10-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: