股骨粗隆间骨折合并外侧壁骨折内固定方式的选择策略
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

新疆石河子大学第三附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Selection strategy of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of femur combined with lateral wall fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

Orthopaedic center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨股骨粗隆间骨折合并外侧壁骨折内固定方式的选择。方法:将57例股骨粗隆间骨折合并外侧壁骨折患者按手术方法不同分为A组及B组,A组采用动力髋螺钉(Dynamic hip screw,DHS)进行治疗,27例;B组采用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(Proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)进行治疗,30例。比较两组患者围手术期指标、髋关节功能情况以及术后疗效。结果:(1)B组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量及住院时间显著优于A组(P<0.05);A组并发症发生率(14.81%)显著高于B组并发症发生率(3.33%)(P<0.05);(2)末次随访时,两组患者改良Harris评分、髋关节屈曲角度、屈曲90°内旋范围均较术前明显改善,且B组明显优于A组(P<0.05);(3)末次随访时,B组患者的疗效评分明显优于A组(P<0.05)。结论:PFNA及DHS均可以对股骨粗隆间骨折合并外侧壁骨折进行治疗,但PFNA明显优于DHS,具有手术时间短、手术创伤小、术后恢复快以及并发症少等优点。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the choice of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of femur combined with lateral wall fracture. Methods: 57 patients with intertrochanteric fractures and lateral wall fractures were divided into groups A and B according to different surgical methods. Group A was treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS), 27 cases; group B was treated with femur proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), 30 cases. The perioperative indicators, hip joint function and postoperative efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results: (1) The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in group B were significantly better than those in group A (P <0.05); the incidence of complications in group A (14.81%) was significantly higher than that in group B (3.33%) (P <0.05); (2) At the last follow-up, the modified Harris score, hip flexion angle, and 90 ° flexion internal rotation range of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and group B was significantly better than group A (P <0.05); (3) At the last follow-up, the curative effect score of patients in group B was significantly better than that in group A (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both PFNA and DHS can treat intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall fractures, but PFNA is significantly better than DHS. It has the advantages of short operation time, less surgical trauma, fast postoperative recovery and fewer complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-17
  • 录用日期:2020-07-13
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: