老年腰椎退变疾病单侧与双侧骨水泥钉道强化的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

上海中医药大学附属光华医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81972118);上海市卫生和计划生育委员会面上项目(编号:201840361);上海市长宁区科学技术委员会重点项目(编号:CNKW2017Z05)


Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with unilateral and bilateral cement augmentation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease
Author:
Affiliation:

Guanghua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 比较经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF)结合单、双侧骨水泥钉道强化治疗双节段老年腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。[方法] 回顾性分析2016年1月~2018年12月采用TILF结合骨水泥钉道强化治疗的59例双节段老年腰椎退行性疾病患者,31例行单侧骨水泥钉道强化,28例行双侧骨水泥钉道强化。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、手术并发症情况。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)评估患者腰部和下肢疼痛程度,采用Oswestry 功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评估患者腰椎功能情况,采用MacNab标准评价临床疗效。根据末次随访时影像资料,比较两组的融合率、螺钉松动发生率。[结果] 两组患者均顺利完成手术,单侧钉道强化组与双侧钉道强化组平均手术时间、骨水泥渗漏率相比差异有统计学差异(P<0.05);平均出血量、住院天数相比差异无统计学差异(P>0.05);两组患者均未发现骨水泥渗漏相关的症状。随访时间14~48个月,平均(24.63±9.22)个月,所有患者均无螺钉松动、断裂及融合器退滑现象。两组内术后3月、末次随访时腰痛、下肢痛VAS评分和ODI值与术前比较差异有统计学差异(P<0.05)。单侧钉道强化组融合成功率(93.55%)、优良率(90.32%)与双侧骨水泥钉道强化组(96.43%、92.86%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] TLIF结合单、双侧骨水泥钉道强化治疗双节段老年腰椎退行性疾病均安全、有效,但是单侧骨水泥钉道强化具有手术时间短、骨水泥渗漏率低的优点,值得在临床进一步推广。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective] To compare clinical efficacy between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) combined with unilateral and bilateral cement-augmented pedicle screw technique applied on the patients in the osteoporotic spine with two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. [Methods] Fifty-nine patients with two-segment lumbar degenerative disease were enrolled in our institute with retrospectively reviewed from January 2016 to December 2018, which had been receiving TLIF combined with augmented pedicle trajectory technique. They were divided into two groups: 31 cases were in the unilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group and the other 28 cases were in the bilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group. Surgical data including operation time,intra-operative blood loss,hospitalization day and surgical complications were recorded, as well as the radiological parameters measured from postoperative images including the rates of fusion and screw loosening. In addition, the low back pain and leg pain were represented as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were recorded individually to evaluate patients' functional recovery. Besides, the MacNab criterion was used for assessment of postoperative efficacy. [Results] The operation was successfully completed in both groups. Compared with bilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group, operation time and cement leakage rate in unilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group decreased significantly (P<0.05). While no statistical difference for the average hospital stay and blood loss was found between 2 groups(P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 14~48 months, the average follow-up time was 24.63±9.22 months. There were no screw loosening, breakage and cage sliding in all patients. After surgeries, low back VAS, leg VAS and ODI at 3 months and final follow-up improved significantly in two groups(P<0.05). There were no significant differences of VAS and ODI preoperatively and postoperatively between 2 groups(P>0.05). In the unilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group, the fusion rate was 93.55%, the excellent and good rate was 94.8%. In the bilateral pedicle trajectory augmented group, the fusion rate was 96.43%, the excellent and good rate was 92.86%, however, no significant difference was found between 2 groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: TLIF combined with unilateral or bilateral cement augmented screw is safe and efficient for the treatment of patients in the osteoporotic spine with two-segment lumbar degenerative disease, but the unilateral augmented pedicle trajectory technique can significantly reduce the operation time and the incidence of cement leakage. It is worthy of further application in clinic work.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-01
  • 录用日期:2020-10-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: