全膝关节置换术后拔除引流管时机探究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

青岛大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(81802151),山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2016HQ05;ZR2017BH089;ZR2019MH012),中国博士后科学基金面上资助(2018M642616),青岛市应用基础研究青年专项(19-6-2-55-cg)


Research on the timing of drainage tube removal after total knee replacement
Author:
Affiliation:

the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Fund Project:

National Science Fund subsidized project (81802151), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016HQ05; ZR2017BH089; ZR2019MH012), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642616), and the Qingdao Basic Research Youth Program

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:通过比较全膝关节置换术后拔出引流管的时机对患者早期临床效果的影响,探究全膝关节置换术后最适拔管时机。方法:选取青岛大学附属医院关节外科2019年2月至5月拟行单侧全膝关节置换术的患者110例,随机分为术后24h拔管组及术后48h拔管组,每组患者55例,记录每例患者术前及术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、患肢腿围、膝关节活动度(ROM)、血色素及感染相关生化指标、膝关节功能评分(KSS)、切口愈合等临床资料。结果:患者全部获得随访,两组患者术后引流量,24h组明显少于48h组且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组大腿周径无明显差异,KSS评分较术前均有明显改善,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);24h组在术后第2天VAS评分和ROM方面明显优于48h组(P<0.05);两组患者术前及术后感染相关生化指标检查结果差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:术后24h拔管组术后早期临床效果优于术后48h组,相较而言适宜拔管。

    Abstract:

    Objective:By comparing the impact of the timing of drainage tube extraction after total knee arthroplasty on patients' early clinical effects, the optimal timing of tube extraction after total knee arthroplasty was explored.Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty from February to May 2019 in the Department of Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were randomly divided into a 24h postoperative extubation group and a 48h postoperative extubation group, with 55 patients in each group , record the clinical Visual Analogue Score (VAS), leg circumference, range of mobility (ROM), hemoglobin and infection-related biochemical indicators, knee function score (KSS), wound healing, etc. of each patient before and after surgery data.Results:All patients in the two groups were followed up for statistical analysis: postoperative drainage volume was significantly lower in the 24h group than that in the 48h group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The peripheral diameter and KSS score of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). VAS score and ROM score on the second day after surgery were significantly better in the 24h group than those in the 48h group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the results of preoperative and postoperative infection-related biochemical indexes (P>0.05).Conclusion:The early clinical effect of extubation 24h after operation was better than that of 48h after operation, which was the appropriate time for extubation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-02
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-12
  • 录用日期:2020-07-17
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: