骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折3种微创术式差异的网状Meta分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

广西中医药大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Comparison of three minimally Operative methods for osteoporotic vertebral com-pression fracture: a network meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

guangxizhongyiyaodaxue

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】[目的]系统评价经皮椎体成形术(PVP)、经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)、编织囊袋扩张椎体成形术(Vesselplasty)等微创术式治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的有效性和安全性的差异。方法 计算机检索维普中文数据库、万方、PubMed、CNKI、The Cochrane library、EMBASE、CBM等数据库,辅以手工检索现有杂志,收集有关PVP、PKP、Vesselplasty治疗OVCF的随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时间截至2020年1月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的质量后,采用WinBUGS 1.4.3软件对纳入的研究进行网状Meta分析。结果 本次分析共纳入11项RCTs,一共包含1356例患者。网状Meta 分析显示:①在降低VAS评分方面,3种术式治疗后的VAS评分两两比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),从优到劣排序为:Vesselplasty>PVP>PKP;②在降低ODI评分方面,3种术式治疗后的ODI评分两两比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),从优到劣排序为:Vesselplasty>PVP>PKP;③在降低伤椎Cobb角方面,PKP术后伤椎Cobb角低于PVP[MD =8.53 ,95%CI(2.61, 14.39)],其余两两比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),从优到劣排序为:PKP>Vesselplasty>PVP;④在减少骨水泥渗漏率方面,Vesselplasty的骨水泥渗漏率低于PKP[OR=0.14,95%CI(0.01, 0.52)],Vesselplasty的骨水泥渗漏率低于PVP[OR=0.06 ,95%CI(0.00, 0.51)],差异均有统计学意义,从优到劣排序为:Vesselplasty>PKP>PVP。结论 基于VAS评分、ODI评分、伤椎Cobb角、骨水泥渗漏率等方面的网状分析结果和概率排序,研究认为Vesselplasty可能是治疗OVCF的首选方案。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】Objective To systematically evaluate the difference in the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, and vesselplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods Databases of VIP, Wanfang, PubMed、CNKI、The Cochrane library、EMBASE、CBM were searched by computer, supplemented by manual retrieval of existing magazines, collected randomized controlled trials on percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), vesselplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, with the retrieval time up to January 2020. After two researchers independently selected literature, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included study, gemtc 0.14.3 software was used to conduct network meta-analysis of the included study. Results 11 studies were included in this analysis, including 1356 patients. Results The network meta-analysis showed that: (1) In terms of reducing the VAS score, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05), and the order from the best to the worst was as follows: Vesselplasty>PVP>PKP; (2) In terms of reducing the ODI score, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05), and the order from the best to the worst was as follows: Vesselplasty>PVP>PKP; ③In terms of reducing Cobb angle, Cobb angle of PKP was lower than that of PVP [MD = 8.53, 95% CI (2.61, 14.39)] , there was no significant difference between the other two groups (P > 0.05), and the order from the best to the worst was as follows: PKP>Vesselplasty>PVP.④In terms of reducing the leakage rate of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement of Vesselplasty was lower than that of PKP [OR=0.14,95%CI(0.01, 0.52)], and the leakage rate of bone cement of Vesselplasty was lower than that of PVP [OR=0.06 ,95%CI(0.00, 0.51)], there was no significant difference between the other two groups (P > 0.05), and the order from the best to the worst was as follows: Vesselplasty>PKP>PVP. Conclusion Based on the results of network meta-analysis and probability ranking of VAS score, ODI score, Cobb angle of injured vertebrae, leakage rate of bone cement and other aspects, vesselplasty may be the first choice for the treatment of OVCF. 【Keep Words】 percutaneous kyphoplasty;vesselplasty;percutaneous vertebroplasty;osteoporotic vertebral com-pression fracture;network meta-analysis

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-13
  • 录用日期:2020-09-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: